Link to AMI history of money and a suggested monetary reform act.
http://www.monetary.org/32pageexplanation.pdf
Money And Monetary Reform
Link to AMI history of money and a suggested monetary reform act.
http://www.monetary.org/32pageexplanation.pdf
JPMorgan vs. Goldman Sachs
Link to article.
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/battle_titans.php
Max Keiser interviews Ellen Brown (Web Of Debt Author).
http://maxkeiser.com/2009/11/06/ote-...h-ellen-brown/
Russian Economist predicts USA will shatter into 6 regional groups in fall of 2010
Map at the end of the article shows the new 6 US Countries.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html
Slap, you have gotta stop listening to those
Economists. They don't call it the Dismal Science for nothing, ya know...
Seems I remember a Russian saying the same thing before too. Oh it is that Russian. Keep saying the same thing over and over again I guess.
Last edited by selil; 02-14-2010 at 05:00 AM.
Sam Liles
Selil Blog
Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.
Ho hum
Slap,
In view of this:. Check Russian TV schedules to see if the US TV series 'Jericho' has been showing, IIRC that too had a similar divided USA.Russian Economist predicts USA will shatter into 6 regional groups
I like the Russian author's theme that 'shatter' will follow existing state borders, contradictory IMHO.
davidbfpo
I like the idea that Alaska will come under Russian rule... has to be because of Sarah Palin, but I'm not quite sure how.Originally Posted by davidbfpo
Since it is Presidents Day, read how President Lincoln handled the Tali-Banksters in his day.
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/li...nd_paulson.php
Max Kesier explains Financial Terrorism(Wall Street Banking) to the President.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUFpZyg2YFA
FW Engdahl on the Greek Financial Crisis.
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?...4&jumival=4827
Hey slap listen carefully to what this guy says.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqe-TtzmV2o
Sam Liles
Selil Blog
Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.
Hey Sam, here is an article by Matt Taibbi. The original problem has never been fixed.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...bailout_hustle
Max Keiser on our new National Anthem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF9fV...layer_embedded
A British perspective by James Robertson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHs9x...eature=related
Cross post on J.K. Galbraith's latest and most important article on money and how it is impossible for a government to run out of money.
http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...4860#post94860
Couple of things in that article kind of jump out...
If deficits benefit ordinary people, ordinary Americans at this point should be richer than Croesus. While deficit money does end up in people's pockets, the people it flows to are generally a long way from ordinary: the beneficiaries of government spending are generally as small a group as the corporate elite.Deficits put money in private pockets. Private households get more cash. They own that cash free and clear, and they can spend it as they like. If they wish, they can also convert it into interest-earning government bonds or they can repay their debts. This is called an increase in "net financial wealth." Ordinary people benefit, but there is nothing in it for banks.
That's just wrong. The deficit reduction of the 90s was driven not by bank lending, but by an outrageous and unsustainable surge in the valuation (not value) of fictitious "assets", like shares of Infospace or Pets.com. Yes, the taxes levied on fantasy "capital gains" balanced the budget, and the hiring sprees by companies spending invested money ran up lovely employment numbers, but at the end of the day all those lavishly paid employees weren't generating products, services, or revenues, and the captial gains were going to get sucked back into the black hole whence they came when valuation and value had to equalize. The mid to late 90s, I fear, represent one of the most egregious and unnecessary lapses in economic policy in American history. Government could have acted, had the tools to act, but simply didn't want to: bubbles are fun as long as they keep on growing, and if the Nasdaq's going up and the intern's going down, everything has got to be ok. Until it isn't. We're still paying the price...Increased private lending generates new tax revenue and smaller deficits; that's what happened in the 1990s.
6 Theories Of The Stock Market Rally
Link to article.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=18034
I'm going to plagiarize that often.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks