I note the use of the nice qualifier "radical" Islam, but its "non radical" Muslims that keep getting killed, and that has the potential to antagonise, and radicalise, a whole lot more who are not radicalised at present. Furthermore, I fail to see how Palestinians can be classified as "radical" for wanting their land back.

The best example of that process in action is the deterioration of Turkish/Israeli relations following Israels ruthless and possibly criminal attack on Gaza, as detailed in the Goldstone report.

To apply the golden rule, how would you feel if China for example said it "was only attacking bad Christians" when a lot of perfectly normal Christians of all ages and sexes kept ending up dead?