Results 1 to 20 of 174

Thread: The USMC in Helmand (merged thread)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Looking back to look forward

    I'll echo Bill's comment and thanks to Tequila. I'd missed the NAF report on Helmand and wonder if anything has changed since September 2010, in Helmand for the locals.

    Citing Bill now and if we had concentrated on:
    local grievances and concerns
    and the principle of reducing harm to the locals, would we have achieved our objectives in Helmand and Afghanistan?

    I know we have attempted to look back at Iraq in the past, then looked around at other conflicts, both active and potential. If we adapted the principles of local issues first and reducing harm to the local populace would that satisfy our strategic objectives?

    Or returning to the Imperial practice in the ungoverned spaces of punitive action and leaving promptly having delivered a message.
    davidbfpo

  2. #2
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default As always, METT-TC applies.

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    Or returning to the Imperial practice in the ungoverned spaces of punitive action and leaving promptly having delivered a message.
    However, properly conducted that was, is and can be very effective far more times than not...

Similar Threads

  1. The David Kilcullen Collection (merged thread)
    By Fabius Maximus in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 451
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 03:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •