SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Futurists & Theorists

Futurists & Theorists Future Competition & Conflict, Theory & Nature of Conflict, 4GW through 9?GW, Transformation, RMA, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2008   #41
TROUFION
Council Member
 
TROUFION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 212
Default Iowa corn etc...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watcher In The Middle View Post
Btw, the very recent US futures market in grains (particularly corn) is showing some interesting trends. Farmers are seeing a very, very strong market for grains up through May/June, but not so much for future deliveries past that. Why the discount? Interesting question there.
What I hear (living in Iowa currently) is that the future (projected) cost of fuel to conduct harvesting and transport of corn and soybean will cut into the profit magin. The famers here are excited about increased value of the staple crops but are not looking forward to paying the fuel cost for combines and trucks.

Livestock farmers are likewise happy with increased value of their animals but are upset by the growing scarcity of feed grain. A lot of the corn and soybean farmers are going after the ethanol and bio-diesel markets that pay slightly higher at this time.

All this is subject to change as is always the case with commodities. However, increased commodity price seems to be the trend for now.

Last edited by Steve Blair; 04-14-2008 at 05:55 PM.
TROUFION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008   #42
jcustis
Council Member
 
jcustis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 2,147
Default

NPR had another spot about the issue on the air today. The systemic problem of the poor competing against ethanol production was highlighted. Anyone know what Brazil uses to produce it's fuel?
jcustis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008   #43
Jedburgh
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,098
Default

ISN Security Watch, 14 Apr 08: The Global Food Fight
Quote:
....The facts are stark: The global price of wheat has risen by 130 percent in the past year, and dairy prices have doubled since 2005. A combination of factors is making basic food and fuel too expensive for people in poorer countries - even as projected world cereal production for 2008 is a record 2,164 million tonnes, up almost 3 percent from last year.

But with across-the-board world food price rises averaging at over 80 percent during the last 24 months, this volatility could acquire a dangerous political counterpart, in countries where 60-75 percent of people's income is spent on food.....

....Another stark fact: Over 240kg of corn would feed one person for a year. This same amount is required to produce just the 100 liters of ethanol needed to fill a SUV tank.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcustis
Anyone know what Brazil uses to produce it's fuel?
Sugarcane
Jedburgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008   #44
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,817
Default global initiative on food security in the wake of violence linked to price rises

French push for EU food response

Quote:
UN special rapporteur Jean Ziegler accused the EU of agricultural dumping in Africa.The European Union has set a target of providing 10% of its fuel for transport from biofuels by 2020, which its own environment advisers have said should be suspended.

There are fears that the use of farmland to grow crops for biofuels has reduced the scope for food production.

The EU is well aware of the risks of soaring food prices and, only last week, Development Commissioner Louis Michel warned of the crisis leading to a "humanitarian tsunami" in Africa.

France will take over the presidency of the EU in July and, in a statement on Friday, four ministers made it clear that the violent response to price rises in Haiti could easily be replicated in 30 other countries.

Protests because of a big increase in the cost of rice have led to a number of deaths in Haiti as well as the fall of the government.
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008   #45
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,817
Default Bush officials defend ethanol as food prices rise

A key goal of the Bush administration has been to boost supplies of renewable fuels to reduce the country's dependence on foreign energy.

Quote:
Ethanol makers will consume about one-quarter of the 13.1-billion-bushel U.S. corn crop this year, according to the Agriculture Department, a forecast that is increasingly alarming world governments and food aid workers.

But corn prices are rocketing to record highs, which will raise prices for a variety of products as corn is widely used as feed for livestock. Corn for delivery in May rose 15-1/4 cents to $6.07 a bushel at the Chicago Board of Trade Tuesday.

Asked about the food crisis and how it related to biofuels, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the two were related but there were a host of other issues involved, such as high transportation costs of food.
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008   #46
M1911A1
Registered User
 
M1911A1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: FT Leavenworth
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcustis View Post
NPR had another spot about the issue on the air today. The systemic problem of the poor competing against ethanol production was highlighted. Anyone know what Brazil uses to produce it's fuel?
Sugar
M1911A1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008   #47
Surferbeetle
Council Member
 
Surferbeetle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,110
Default Business Metrics

Bloomberg has website that provides a snapshot of commodities futures for those of you interested in keeping track. George Soros provided some predictions today on the commodities market...

Quote:
April 17 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire George Soros said the boom in commodities is still in a ``growth phase'' after prices for oil, wheat and gold rose to records.

``You have a generalized commodity bubble due to commodities having become an asset class that institutions use to an increasing extent,'' Soros said today at an event sponsored by the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels. ``On top of that you have specific factors that create the relative shortage of oil and, now, also food.''

Commodities are in their seventh year of gains, with oil rising to a record $115.54 a barrel today as the dollar plunged to an all-time low against the euro. Rice has more than doubled in a year, while corn has advanced 68 percent and wheat 92 percent. Investments in commodities rose by more than a fifth in the first quarter to $400 billion, Citigroup Inc. said April 7.
__________________
Sapere Aude
Surferbeetle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008   #48
Watcher In The Middle
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default Rice in the Commodity Marets is "Hot" right now

Here's three charts of most recent numbers. There's some interesting information here:

The first chart is who consumes the most rice. No major surprises there:

Rice Consumption by Nation

But then we move on to who produces how much:

Rice Production By Nation

Now, we are starting to see some "issues". Some consumers on the 1st list, have no measurable production capability (on the 2nd list). And other nations have some large gaps between their consumption and their production.

So let's take a look at the rice exporting nations:

Rice Exports By Nation

Now, we have some serious issues. By my count, at least five of those exporting nations have put some form of export controls/tariffs on their food exports, rice in particular.

And the latest is that 2 of the top 3 (Thailand and India; #1 and #3 respectively) have both just "indicated" (from the government, no less) that they expect that a new "base price" of $1,000 per ton will be the minimum price for rice exports. For comparison, at the end of 2007, price was around $360 a ton. This last week in Thailand, rice hit $760 a ton.

Exporters are literally having to break existing supply contracts left and right because the farmers and millers they buy from are simply refusing to supply the rice already contracted for at lower prices.

Btw, two of the bigger rice importers (Indonesia and Iran) are already squawking about prices and terms. Iran in particular.

That's going to be a fun set of negotiations to watch. Because truth of the matter is that the most open source of supply for rice right now is the US.
Watcher In The Middle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008   #49
Bill Moore
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,010
Default Complex problem that is expanding rapidly

We always notice a problem after it gets to a point where it becomes extremely challenging to deal with. Our government and others normally ignore the warning signs that point to trouble whether it is global warming, peak oil, or food shortages (translated as food prices) and call those who point them out as representing poor scientific method, and attempt to kill their credibility on Fox News. Then when the problem explodes beyond the manageable we react. Numerous experts pointed out the false profits who preached using corn for ethanol, but that is only one factor contributing to this problem.

The rapid inflation of oil and food prices has now touched many Americans, but not the ones who make policy or the ones who enjoy the SWJ for the most part. Unfortunately we won't feel it until there are riots in our streets, new grass root political parties form, etc.. Equally important (or perhaps more important in the short term) the food inflation is touching huge swaths of the population in South and Southeast Asia, South America, etc., where the population has enjoyed an increasing standard of living for years, now the rug is getting pulled out from under their feet. This will potentially serve as a catalyst for civil unrest and government initiated price controls (a short term fix that will probably make the problem worse in the long run). This is a great rallying call for some insurgent leaders who will exploit anything that makes the government appear illegitimate.


This is a global problem and will require a global response, which means we'll have to cooperate with organizations that we have marginalized in recent years. I think the second and third order effects on our political, social and economic systems will be greater than most assume.
Bill Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008   #50
Watcher In The Middle
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default Nice Thoughts, but unlikely....

Originally posted by Bill Moore:
Quote:
This is a global problem and will require a global response, which means we'll have to cooperate with organizations that we have marginalized in recent years. I think the second and third order effects on our political, social and economic systems will be greater than most assume.
Don't see it happening. Certainly not with any high level of UN involvement. The whole UN "Oil For Food" program fiasco will immediately reappear in all it's full blown glory, and there isn't a US pol out there ready to grab for that one again, particularly with the US probably going to have to be a major source of food supply for any such effort. A total non-starter.

The other part of the problem is that honestly, both China and OPEC have had more of an negative influence on the overall psyche of the Commodities Marketplace than most people realize. It's an attitude like "So rice is a grand a ton. Oil's $120 a Bbl. You want Cheap rice? Then cheap rice = cheap oil. Otherwise ante up & pay the price".

And China comes across as willing to do business with virtually anybody. And it's been coming across to the general public as paying off for them. Now, if you look closely, it's not necessarily true, because China has quite a number of very serious issues. But the Marketplace is becoming increasingly desensitized to these issues in the developing nations. It's becoming a very harsh environment out there.

Just look at Zimbabwe as an example. If these "global organizations" want to really make a difference, get rid of Robert Mugabe and his thugs and get "Africa's Breadbasket" back into the food production business again. Because that's just going to be one of the type of steps required to realistically create long term price and supply stability in the commodities markets.
Watcher In The Middle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008   #51
Surferbeetle
Council Member
 
Surferbeetle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watcher In The Middle View Post

....The whole UN "Oil For Food" program fiasco will immediately reappear in all it's full blown glory, and there isn't a US pol out there ready to grab for that one again....

The other part of the problem is that honestly, both China and OPEC have had more of an negative influence on the overall psyche of the Commodities Marketplace than most people realize. It's an attitude like "So rice is a grand a ton. Oil's $120 a Bbl. You want Cheap rice? Then cheap rice = cheap oil. Otherwise ante up & pay the price".

And China comes across as willing to do business with virtually anybody. And it's been coming across to the general public as paying off for them. Now, if you look closely, it's not necessarily true, because China has quite a number of very serious issues. But the Marketplace is becoming increasingly desensitized to these issues in the developing nations. It's becoming a very harsh environment out there.
Watcher in the Middle,

Appreciate the links. No, I would agree that government intervention/price controls are not the answer, Argentina provides a fairly recent Latin American example of why.

This week's Economist offers an interesting analysis and solution

Quote:
In general, governments ought to liberalise markets, not intervene in them further. Food is riddled with state intervention at every turn, from subsidies to millers for cheap bread to bribes for farmers to leave land fallow. The upshot of such quotas, subsidies and controls is to dump all the imbalances that in another business might be smoothed out through small adjustments onto the one unregulated part of the food chain: the international market.

For decades, this produced low world prices and disincentives to poor farmers. Now, the opposite is happening. As a result of yet another government distortion—this time subsidies to biofuels in the rich world—prices have gone through the roof. Governments have further exaggerated the problem by imposing export quotas and trade restrictions, raising prices again. In the past, the main argument for liberalising farming was that it would raise food prices and boost returns to farmers. Now that prices have massively overshot, the argument stands for the opposite reason: liberalisation would reduce prices, while leaving farmers with a decent living.

There is an occasional exception to the rule that governments should keep out of agriculture. They can provide basic technology: executing capital-intensive irrigation projects too large for poor individual farmers to undertake, or paying for basic science that helps produce higher-yielding seeds. But be careful. Too often—as in Europe, where superstitious distrust of genetic modification is slowing take-up of the technology—governments hinder rather than help such advances. Since the way to feed the world is not to bring more land under cultivation, but to increase yields, science is crucial.
__________________
Sapere Aude
Surferbeetle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008   #52
Watcher In The Middle
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default Here's an excellent example of why working with the UN...

over food shortages is a complete non-starter:

Quote:
UN Expert Calls Biofuel 'Crime Against Humanity'
By Edith M. Lederer, Associated Press
posted: 27 October 2007 09:40 pm ET

UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- A U.N. expert on Friday called the growing practice of converting food crops into biofuel "a crime against humanity,'' saying it is creating food shortages and price jumps that cause millions of poor people to go hungry.

Jean Ziegler, who has been the United Nations' independent expert on the right to food since the position was established in 2000, called for a five-year moratorium on biofuel production to halt what he called a growing "catastrophe'' for the poor.

Scientific research is progressing very quickly, he said, ''and in five years it will be possible to make biofuel and biodiesel from agricultural waste'' rather than wheat, corn, sugar cane and other food crops.
Link

Now, think of this "stupidity" from a political viewpoint here in the US (like in the Midwest). Explain to me exactly how you are going to get (a) Max Baucus (D-MT); (b) Tom Harkin (D-IA); Evan Byah (D-IN), or virtually any other US Senator from the Midwest (Democrat or Republican) to advocate working with the UN, and in effect just handing their potential opponents an issue over dissing their farming base of supporters.

You aren't going to get a one of them to support you, because imagine telling a farmer that because they support Ethanol, they are part of committing a "crime against humanity" - just because they FARM for a living.

I mean, how stupid can you get???

Ethanol production from corn just isn't an efficient idea. Ethanol from sugar cane is much better (than corn) from a production standpoint. But talking smack to the farming community is a sure-fire way to make sure you get nowhere fast.

/rant off
Watcher In The Middle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008   #53
Ron Humphrey
Council Member
 
Ron Humphrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,099
Post You know, I just love this thread

It brings to mind how often I fail to expand my mental horizon's in considering strategic implication's.


Wonder how those non-state actor's did in counting on this type of thing?

Quote:
That's going to be a fun set of negotiations to watch. Because truth of the matter is that the most open source of supply for rice right now is the US.
__________________
Quote:
Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur
Ron Humphrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008   #54
bourbon
Council Member
 
bourbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Humphrey View Post
Wonder how those non-state actor's did in counting on this type of thing?
I firmly of the believe that persons connected to bin Laden, and/or AQ, are profiting handsomely in commodity and financial markets. These are smart people, they've read Paul Kennedy's Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, they know high finance, they know oil. They could have readily anticipated the cascading effects of a surge in oil prices. I think it is likely that they did, and that they consider it a pillar in their strategy of defeating the US by leading it blindly to its fiscal demise.

Quote:
"We -- with God's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it."
- Fatwa Urging Jihad Against Americans, published in Al-Quds al-'Arabi on Febuary 23, 1998
bourbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008   #55
Watcher In The Middle
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default Tend to doubt that...

Originally posted by Bourbon:
Quote:
I firmly of the believe that persons connected to bin Laden, and/or AQ, are profiting handsomely in commodity and financial markets. These are smart people, they've read Paul Kennedy's Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, they know high finance, they know oil. They could have readily anticipated the cascading effects of a surge in oil prices. I think it is likely that they did, and that they consider it a pillar in their strategy of defeating the US by leading it blindly to its fiscal demise.
There's just way too much smart money out there for this to happen. Besides, the last time around where there was cascading oil prices worldwide, the whole ag community took it in the shorts. Not happening this time around. Actually, it's going 180 degrees this time around.

Looking back at the last 12 to 18 months, there were a few people who predicted this, but not many (I mean like a handfull). Most missed big time on the whole ag commodities market (too much time spent on Hedge funds, with all the CDO's and SIV's in the subprime markets).

Truthfully, we here at SWJ did a better job of seeing the effects even before the MSM starting running all their "scare" stories.

If this is their version of our "financial demise", well, they may hit Wall Street (although methinks Wall Street pretty much did it to themselves without a whole lot of outside help), but in the MidWest and the other ag production areas of the US, Main Street is doing pretty well, thank you. Not perfect, but pretty well.
Watcher In The Middle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008   #56
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,817
Default Biofuel Summits and a Smiggin of Politics

Interesting this Bio Fuel web page and reading what took place just days prior to the St. Petersburg, Russia bio fuels summit last week. Russia's Itera Group just dumped 256 million into a project to produce bioethanol in Clearfield, Pennsylvania and further intend to build yet another plant in Louisiana by 2009

Now the UK will perform the two-step with PM Brown having just addressed the UN on "tackling hunger "a moral challenge" for everyone", he's now set to address pro-bio fuels at the Madrid Summit today. The answer is apparently both calling for an agricultural revolution "involving technology that would help farmers in developing countries grow higher-yielding crops".
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008   #57
Watcher In The Middle
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default Interesting Marketplace these days...

All sorts of little pieces out there, goings on..

The Philippines purchases rice through a national government body (NFA; National Food Authority) for imports. They just went out for a tender for 500k metric tons (approx. 2400 lbs per metric ton), due 05.05.2008, and it looks like they only got around 350k out of the requested 500k from the previous tender.

The Philippines is actually looking to change the methods they use to buy rice because of the escalating costs.

Now this next part is just beyond words:
Quote:
Japan, the world's biggest net food importer, will ask the World Trade Organization as early as next week to introduce rules to stop countries restricting grain exports, Hiroaki Kojima, deputy director for international economic affairs at Japan's Agriculture Ministry, said on April 22.

Persuading the WTO to intervene may be tough for Japan, which protects its agriculture with subsidies and import tariffs as high as 700 percent on farm products. Developing nations are pressing Japan to cut the duties and open its market in the Doha Round of trade talks.
LInk to Article

The really interesting part in the Commodities market is that the futures market is now showing a rise in the dollar against other currencies. It's seemingly having no real effect on base commodity (food) prices, though.

Also, this whole re-thinking of Ethanol subsidies by the political chattering classes is nice, but it's really only going to have an effect on corn and/or soybeans, and that's if any subsidy cutback actually is passed into law (odds are against). Reason is that it's not all of the sudden going to affect either wheat growing areas, or rice growing areas.

If the farming community doesn't plant corn, they rotate and plant soybeans. Crop rotation cycles has more to do with it than ethanol subsidies.

Today, the real fight is a battle over (a) Cut ethanol subsidies back home here so it's more corn/soybeans for food, or (b) Spend our money we allocate for food purchases in foreign markets, instead of here in the US. If we buy here in the US, we support our markets, but then we have to pay higher transportation rates to get the food to it's intended location.

That's the real behind the scenes fight going on right now, and it's a no-holds-barred fight. Funny thing is, if we spend that money in overseas markets, we'll probably end up lowering our commodity food prices here back home, because right now, the federal government purchases are just working as a little extra 'spike' in commodity food prices. In the past, it's been more of a 'floor' - now it's functioning as a jack to raise the ceiling.

The above is a short term 'fix'. We still need to address the whole corn production for Ethanol or for food issue.

Another aspect to this entire discussion is that the big AG operations (Monsanto, Dow AgroScience, Pioneer, Syngenta, Bayer Crop Science, and any number of others) are having a major benefit dropped in their laps, which is a renewed push for increasing acceptance of biotechnology in crop production.

For the Ethanol vrs. food debate, see the NCGA National Corn Growers Assoc. website for their (obviously biased) viewpoint, but they make a very valid point on their website:

Quote:
ďItís Not Food, Itís Not Fuel, Itís ChinaĒ (05-02-08)
A change in Chinese meat consumption habits since 1995 is diverting eight billion bushels of grain per year to livestock feed and could empty global grain stocks by September 2010, according to a new study from Biofuels Digest
Link to the article

I guess my biggest problem is with the MSM as they cover the whole "food crisis", which is that they are big into hype and emotion (and with "gotcha journalism" being a requirement), and totally clueless on how to deal with the real underlying issues, much less explain the costs and benefits of the potential solutions.
Watcher In The Middle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008   #58
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,817
Default UN food body 'should be scrapped'

Senagal's President Abdoulaye Wade dismissed the UN's food agency as a "waste of money" days after the UN announced an emergency plan to bring soaring world food prices under control.

Quote:
His comments came as Nigeria braced for a national strike by bakers over the cost of flour and sugar.

Some global food prices have nearly doubled in the past three years, provoking riots and other protests in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Last week the UN unveiled a $200m (£100m) package to boost food production in the worst-affected countries.

Mr Wade said on Senegalese radio and television that the FAO's work was duplicated by other organisations that operated more efficiently.
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008   #59
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,817
Default The Russian View

World Food Crisis: Jewel in whose crown?

"The much-vaunted political and economic model the world has so readily adopted and whose virtues so many have for so long expounded, simply does not work."

Quote:
... The market-based economy is based on fundamentals too easily swayed by speculation and Social Democracy would have all the ingredients for a perfect mix, but for the fact that it is neither democratic, nor is its social component minimally sufficient to meet the needs of the citizens of the world. The current food crisis is a shining example of the disaster this model has become.

However, how telling it is of todayís international community that the United Nationsí World Food Programme is currently struggling with a shortfall of some 755 million USD in funding, in a world more intent on wasting hundreds, if not thousands, of billions of dollars on wanton acts of butchery such as we see in Iraq than on providing public services on a global scale. Such is the wonderful capitalist-monetarist system the world has embraced as its economic and social Manna.

More than a feather in the cap, the world food crisis is a shining jewel in the crown of an economic and political system whose only raison díÍtre was from the beginning to be a thorn in the side of Socialism and which did not rest until trillions of dollars had been wasted in sabotaging the model.
Then there's this tidbit of hope, or is it ?

Russia may prevent global food crisis

Quote:
... the entrepreneurial zeal transforming the Russian agricultural landscape will only restore some equilibrium to a dynamic market. So, while wheat at $12 a bushel might prove to have been a temporary blip, $4.50 a bushel is unlikely to be seen any time soon - even if it rains again in Australia one day.
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008   #60
Beelzebubalicious
Council Member
 
Beelzebubalicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: currently in Washington DC
Posts: 321
Default

Great. Just what we need - to become dependent on Russia for food and energy. I'm sure they're also stockpiling women for the growing gender deficit...
Beelzebubalicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation