Page 32 of 41 FirstFirst ... 223031323334 ... LastLast
Results 621 to 640 of 807

Thread: China's Emergence as a Superpower (till 2014)

  1. #621
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    “The new American ‘pivot towards Asia’ is a brilliant illustration of the place of this region which is now key to the balance of today’s world and in defining our security interests. This area is indeed a strategic stake for France which is and will remain a power in the Pacific and Indian Ocean. I came here to affirm that France firmly intends to remain committed to fostering security in the Asia Pacific area.”--------- French Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Address at Shangri-La Dialogue Singapore June 03 2012.
    http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/pap...paper5081.html

  2. #622
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default

    France appears to be working aggressively to reestablish influence in many of their old haunts.

    When nations wearied of French control and colonialism, many turned to the US for hope. Now it appears it is France that is offering itself as a less controlling option. Ironic.
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

  3. #623
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default France returns to old haunts?

    Bob,

    What evidence supports your argument? Leaving aside Libya.
    France appears to be working aggressively to reestablish influence in many of their old haunts.
    In the Pacific France has retained most of colonies; in Asia I think France is glad to be gone (Cambodia did see some activity when peace was achieved); in Africa she has retreated, in the Ivory Coast she had to "share" peacekeeping with the UN (which failed) and in the Middle East selling weapons in the Gulf and being noisy on Syria hardly fits.

    The UK of course has a new, stronger relationship with France and President Hollande has taken a little step to show this:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-18548327
    davidbfpo

  4. #624
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    Has France any military assets to spare for the Pacific?

    If so, how?

  5. #625
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Influence is not achieved only by the deployment of military assets... still, I haven't seen much evidence that the French are trying to build influence in the neighborhood, would be interested in the sources behind the claim.
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

  6. #626
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default

    Ray's source is the first I have seen in regard to the Pacific. I had just been noticing in recent months a variety of sources in regard to the recent rise of how residents of the Middle East perceived France as compared to other Western powers.

    Here is one source, a youth survey in the Middle East in 2012
    http://www.arabyouthsurvey.com/engli...12_English.pdf


    "ARAB YOUTH SEE FRANCE
    MOST FAVOURABLY
    AMONG ALL FOREIGN
    COUNTRIES; VIEWS OF
    CHINA AND INDIA ARE
    ALSO INCREASINGLY
    POSITIVE
    One year after the start of the
    Arab Spring, young people in the
    Middle East have changed some
    of their views of major foreign
    powers, and now look more
    favourably upon France, China
    and India"
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

  7. #627
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Of course a French Defence Minister on a tour of Asia will make brave noises about commitment to the region, but I have to wonder if those noises are being backed up by any sort of action.
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

  8. #628
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default How much of U.S. consumables are made in China?

    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  9. #629
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    French military Strategy

    http://www.cfr.org/france/french-mil...gration/p16619

    French Foreign, Defense, And National Security Policy: New Initiatives?

    http://www.stimson.org/spotlight/fre...w-initiatives/

  10. #630
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quick plausibility check:

    http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html

    "2012 : U.S. trade in goods with China"
    "TOTAL 2012 (...) 127,032.0" (imports, million USD)
    in 4 months, so roughly 380 billion in a year.

    U.S. production of goods (this goes beyond consumption just as the trade statistic):
    https://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTableHTML.cfm?reqID=5
    "Gross Output by Industry Billions of dollars"
    "All industries" "2010"(last available, dunno why) "25811.4"
    (Note: U.S. definition of "industries" isn't actually about resource production and manufacturing only!)

    Quick check using the gross figures instead of value added:
    380/25811.4*100% = approx. 1.5%
    So this is probably approx. where they got the pie chart's 1.2+0.7% from.

    It looks to be at about the same order of magnitude as the 1.2+0.7% of the pie chart.
    This was about gross output. Total GDP of the U.S. is only about 15.1 trillion, though -and only about 20% of it is primary+secondary sector. Obviously, gross output is a poor base for such calculations as it's bigger than the GDP!


    Now let's look at value added:
    https://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTableHTML.cfm?reqID=5 (direct links don't seem to work well there)

    "Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting"
    "Mining
    "Utilities"
    "Construction"
    "Manufacturing"
    (these are as far as I can tell the true goods-producing sectors)
    "Value Added by Industry Billions of dollars"
    year: "2011"
    "177.8"
    "287.6"
    "250.8"
    "520.3"
    "1837.0"
    sum: 3037


    Now let's have fun and compare the 380 billion with the 3037 billion:
    380/3037*100% = approx. 12.5%

    I call the pie chart B.S.


    (I love it when I make a 15 minute plausibility check and it's not in vain!)

    Whoever compiled that chart was either incompetent, did at least one mistake less than me and/or meant to produce wrong propaganda.

    After all, the share of Chinese goods in consumables is likely larger than smaller in comparison to its share in regard to investment goods.

  11. #631
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default Wörter und Konzepte

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    Whoever compiled that chart was either incompetent, did at least one mistake less than me and/or meant to produce wrong propaganda.
    It’s a graphic in an article published via the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. As to whether the authors [1, 2] are culpable on any of those three counts, I suspect…

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    Quick check using the gross figures instead of value added:
    380/25811.4*100% = approx. 1.5%
    So this is probably approx. where they got the pie chart's 1.2+0.7% from.
    that the issue might be one of operational definitions. Perhaps that you are not reading <content> as per the authors’ usage? From the article:

    Of the 2.7% of U.S. consumer purchases going to goods labeled “Made in China,” only 1.2% actually represents China-produced content. If we take into account imported intermediate goods, about 13.9% of U.S. consumer spending is attributable to imports, including 1.9% imported from China.
    Last edited by ganulv; 06-25-2012 at 06:35 PM.
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  12. #632
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Their credentials aren't better than mine, academically.

    The Chinese are not known for exporting investment goods. Thus most of their exports to the U.S. are about consumption goods.

    They produce most of the intermediate goods for their production (metals, plastics) by themselves, so the overwhelming share of their goods exports is really Chinese value added.

    Their goods exports to the U.S. are large in comparison to the U.S. OVERALL production of goods.


    Sorry, their pie chart flunks the plausibility test badly, almost by an order of magnitude.

    Feel free to ask for a 4th opinion.



    Besides; it's probably pointless to mention in an anglophone forum, but U.S. econ statistics have become questionable years ago.
    Example: FTD "Quadratur des US-Wirtschaftskreislaufes", 6.5.2007
    (A complete copy is here, but google translate won't help with so many econ terminology in it.)
    Excerpt (one of many inconsistencies mentioned there): The U.S. statistics claimed an increase in capital investment by 4.4% at the same time when the U.S. investment goods industry was supposed to have experienced a 10.2% turnover slump.

  13. #633
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default Did you read the paper?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    Their credentials aren't better than mine, academically.
    One literally cannot achieve a higher level of credentialization in the U.S. than those two have! Our university system does not offer students the option to habilitate and does not require it of faculty. But that’s neither here nor there…

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    The Chinese are not known for exporting investment goods. Thus most of their exports to the U.S. are about consumption goods.

    They produce most of the intermediate goods for their production (metals, plastics) by themselves, so the overwhelming share of their goods exports is really Chinese value added.

    Their goods exports to the U.S. are large in comparison to the U.S. OVERALL production of goods.


    Sorry, their pie chart flunks the plausibility test badly, almost by an order of magnitude.

    Feel free to ask for a 4th opinion.
    You appear to fail to apprehend that the pie chart is meant to illustrate U.S. consumer spending on all goods and services. The vast majority of American consumer spending is on housing, sustenance, insurance, pensions, health care, and education. Contrary to your assertion, any version of that pie chart which is not mostly grey does not pass the plausibility test. That fact stands even if the authors’ methodology is shoddy and even if the statistics are bad.
    Last edited by ganulv; 06-25-2012 at 09:20 PM. Reason: formatt
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  14. #634
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Probably exaggerated, still of interest... the list could be a whole lot longer:

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...mic_apocalypse
    5 Signs of the Chinese Economic Apocalypse
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

  15. #635
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob's World View Post
    "ARAB YOUTH SEE FRANCE MOST FAVOURABLY
    AMONG ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES;"
    Winning friends and influencing people via the Armee de l'Air.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  16. #636
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayuhan View Post
    Probably exaggerated, still of interest... the list could be a whole lot longer:

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...mic_apocalypse
    Keep an eye on iTulip.com forum for analysis of the China slowdown.

    It's well worth putting on the reading list for analysis on China as well as the entire GFC.

  17. #637
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Classic tale

    What a great example of inter-dependence from the FP article, my emphasis:
    Electricity consumption usually spikes over the summer, as people turn on their air-conditioners to cope with the seasonal heat. But this year, many Chinese appear to be braving the high temperatures to economize. China's ports are piled high with coal that should be roaring in the country's power plants.... Now it looks as if China has imported more fuel than it needs, as hard-pressed citizens, businesses, and factories cut their electricity consumption in order to reduce their bills.

    The national price of coal has already dropped 10 percent since late last year. This drop could further dent the global economy, which would in turn cool demand for Chinese exports even more. That's globalization for you: A Chinese person turns off the air-conditioning, and the world economy catches a cold.
    davidbfpo

  18. #638
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries

    Burma, Laos, Northern India, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the Ryukyu Islands, 300 islands of the South China, East China and Yellow Seas, as well as Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Taiwan, South Kazakhstan, the Afghan province of Bahdashan, Transbaikalia and the Far East to South Okhotsk - here is the complete list of areas that, according to Zedong, were lost due to the fall of the Qing empire.
    Any territorial dispute, but rather, its resolution, is a serious precedent. If China’s claim in respect of at least one territory from the list of the "lost" is satisfied, the Chinese machine would be unstoppable. Despite the fact that the Chinese are very pleased to partner with Russia and have always supported Russia in the UN Security Council, in person, on the sidelines, its diplomats supposedly jokingly hint to their Russian colleagues: you must understand that soon you will have to share the Far East?
    http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/...rial_claims-0/

  19. #639
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default Irredentism...

    one of those things that make for good neighbors...or is that fences?
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  20. #640
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

Similar Threads

  1. Ukraine (closed; covers till August 2014)
    By Beelzebubalicious in forum Europe
    Replies: 1934
    Last Post: 08-04-2014, 07:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •