Results 1 to 20 of 770

Thread: South China Sea and China (2011-2017)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member LawVol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kabul
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Yes, they have a plan and we don't.
    You are correct, but any plan, at this point, would require a greater embrace of international institutions and international law than most Americans are willing to have. While I certainly embrace traditional notions of territorial sovereignty, I am against expanding it to areas typically viewed as global commons. Freedom of navigation within the commons is crucial to American security interests and the crux of the international economy. Thorough a closer embrace of international institutions and law we can "prep the battlefield" and perhaps increase those connections Gates spoke of.

    Have we focused too much on the "war of terror" and thus dropped the ball in the Pacific? Is this issue evidence of our need to pursue a different strategy with respect to terrorism, so we can remember the big picture?
    -john bellflower

    Rule of Law in Afghanistan

    "You must, therefore know that there are two means of fighting: one according to the laws, the other with force; the first way is proper to man, the second to beasts; but because the first, in many cases, is not sufficient, it becomes necessary to have recourse to the second." -- Niccolo Machiavelli (from The Prince)

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Thougfht I'd share this map asa reference. Map originates from an old web article here
    Conflict in the South China Sea: China’s Relations with Vietnam and the Philippines


    p.s. Not as big as I would have liekd. Sort of makes a mockery of posting it as a reference aid.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LawVol View Post
    Have we focused too much on the "war of terror" and thus dropped the ball in the Pacific? Is this issue evidence of our need to pursue a different strategy with respect to terrorism, so we can remember the big picture?
    I would say yes. I think China jumps up and down whenever we spend massive resources on wars of choice instead of building a country for the 21st Century.

  4. #4
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default The China Question

    All, if you get a chance watch this tonight. Check your local listings.


    http://thechinaquestion.com/

  5. #5
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default A map helps

    In a BBC report on the PRC's aircraft carrier is a small map of the South China Sea and the disputed islands (my IT skills preclude placing it here):http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13692558

    The dotted line showing China's claims do make one pause for thought.
    davidbfpo

  6. #6
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Don't worry about the south china sea look what they want to do in Boise,Idaho.



    http://endoftheamericandream.com/arc...of-boise-idaho

  7. #7
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Slap:

    That story is a little breathless, the implication being the thousands of Chinamen are going to be establishing an enclave in Idaho, sort of the Shanghai legations reversed. I'll believe it when I see it. If the Chinese want to build businesses and facilities in Idaho, essentially giving us money, let 'em at it. The Idahos won't care who signs the paycheck as long as it doesn't bounce.

    The story also contains this quote:

    "The borrower is always the servant of the lender, and now China is buying up America."

    That is true unless you get into really big money, then the situation is reversed. Or so says Donald Trump.
    Last edited by carl; 06-08-2011 at 04:38 PM.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  8. #8
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carl View Post
    Slap:

    That story is a little breathless, the implication being the thousands of Chinamen are going to be establishing an enclave in Idaho, sort of the Shanghai legations reversed. I'll believe it when I see it. If the Chinese want to build businesses and facilities in Idaho, essentially giving us money, let 'em at it. The Idahos won't care who signs the paycheck as long as it doesn't bounce.

    The story also contains this quote:

    "The borrower is always the servant of the lender, and now China is buying up America."

    That is true unless you get into really big money, then the situation is reversed. Or so says Donald Trump.
    Carl, maybe you are right but what I thought was most interesting was the concept of a self sustaining city.....what exactly does that mean? Invasion by we(China) have a better idea on how to run things.

Similar Threads

  1. China's Emergence as a Superpower (2015 onwards)
    By davidbfpo in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 147
    Last Post: 08-18-2019, 09:56 PM
  2. Wargaming the South China Sea
    By AdamG in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-05-2017, 10:05 PM
  3. China’s View of South Asia and the Indian Ocean
    By George L. Singleton in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 01-09-2017, 01:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •