Results 1 to 20 of 197

Thread: Moving the Rhod. Fire Force concept to Afghanistan?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default And then there's this

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhodesian View Post
    Understood on the Apache, I was thinking more of schrapnel coverage if the shell strike is in trees etc, or what the coverage is for a single modern 30mm striking hard or soft ground?
    LINK. They look less far away from the Apache in some parts of the video than they actually are due to the magnification of the stabilized sight.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    CenTex
    Posts
    222

    Default

    4M against soft targets.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    LINK. They look less far away from the Apache in some parts of the video than they actually are due to the magnification of the stabilized sight.
    A six step process before they could open fire?

    Yes indeed, can't use a fire force under those conditions.

    ...then again if the gunship is that effective maybe you don't need a fire force anyway. Wow, we could have done with a couple of those.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •