SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Military - Other

Military - Other Echelons away from the trigger pullers, from operational art and theater logistics to service combat development to just plain FOBbits.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2013   #1
MattClimbs717
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5
Default Recapitalizing the U.S. Air Force: Pay Now, Or Pay Later

http://www.the-american-interest.com...cfm?piece=1397

Quote:
Recapitalizing the U.S. Air Force: Pay Now, Or Pay Later
by Dr. Richard Andres

As the U.S. military prepares to enter a period of reduced budgets, the services have endeavored to explain their strategic value to the nation. The Navy has positioned itself as the defender of the global commons and, more broadly, as a “global force for good”; the Army, as a globally dispersed boots-on-the-ground “force for tomorrow”, able to reduce instability abroad. Agree or disagree with these arguments, they are well articulated and offer visions for how the Army’s and Navy’s budgets support American interests.

As the budget axe hovers, however, the Air Force has remained peculiarly silent about the value it brings to U.S. national security. The reason for this is not hard to fathom. Five years ago, the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Air Force were fired for too vocally defending their service, and subsequently a number of Air Force generals have been dismissed for the same reason. Today, Air Force intellectuals remain gun-shy about publicly discussing the service’s role in national defense in any but the most tactical ways. That's unfortunate, because the Air Force brings a set of unique capabilities to America’s national defense that deserve careful consideration as the nation ponders what to reduce or remove.[1]

Last edited by davidbfpo; 03-23-2013 at 12:08 AM. Reason: Pruned due to copyright issues. PM to author
MattClimbs717 is offline  
Old 03-22-2013   #2
MattClimbs717
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5
Default

Deleted

Last edited by davidbfpo; 03-23-2013 at 12:04 AM. Reason: Pruned due to copyright issues
MattClimbs717 is offline  
Old 03-22-2013   #3
Dayuhan
Council Member
 
Dayuhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
Posts: 3,136
Default

I noticed this relevant article not long ago:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...automatic-cuts

Key quote:

Quote:
[retired Marine Corps Major General Arnold] Punaro said the cost of the Defense Department's "massive and inefficient overhead," at $218 billion a year, was greater than the economy of the entire state of Israel.

"If you just look at the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the combatant commands and the defense agencies ... there's over 250,000 people, $116 billion a year," he said.

"There's not a trigger-puller in that lot. There's nobody with a sharp bayonet in that group," said Punaro, adding that of the top 12 defense contractors, half were agencies of the Pentagon.
Unfortunately, when budget cuts come around the reaction in Government agencies (not just the military but across the board) is typically not to try to cut the fat, keep the meat, and maintain effectiveness with less resources. The reaction is typically to cut what's visible and vital, in an effort to generate a backlash of protest that will get "their" money back. If you show that you can do the job with less, you'll never get more, and nobody wants to do that.

That needs to stop, across the full spectrum of government.
__________________
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

H.L. Mencken
Dayuhan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sudan Watch (to July 2012) SWJED Africa 124 07-06-2012 04:18 PM
The Never Ending Airpower Versus Groundpower Debate Tom Odom Futurists & Theorists 200 12-11-2008 04:00 PM
Future Conflict Reid Bessenger Futurists & Theorists 15 11-20-2008 08:58 PM
U.S. Air Force Loses Out in Iraq War SWJED Equipment & Capabilities 6 12-20-2006 02:41 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation