Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: Social Media: the widest impact of (merged thread)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default I wholeheartedly agree with David

    on my first reading; very bad format, over long, redundancy, developed world centric, inadequate attention to AM radio, etc. etc. DoD should only be involved at the operational and tactical level and then only lightly. It does not really address interface or dealing with a potentially hostile US media presence who will challenge anything done by the government just so they can say they did...

    That said, however, like Sam, I'm still mulling.

  2. #2
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Question As a matter of fact

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    on my first reading; very bad format, over long, redundancy, developed world centric, inadequate attention to AM radio, etc. etc. DoD should only be involved at the operational and tactical level and then only lightly. It does not really address interface or dealing with a potentially hostile US media presence who will challenge anything done by the government just so they can say they did...

    That said, however, like Sam, I'm still mulling.
    Long enough that I decided to wait till next week to really dig into it.

    That said I think this right towards the beginning is somewhat indicative of the problem your both pointing out.

    DoD has the opportunity, if it so chooses, to strengthen its participation in national public diplomacy
    and public affaires engagements. At the conclusion of the paper, we present recommendations in support of DoD public
    diplomacy and public affairs transformation
    DoD must not act alone: The interagency community and affected
    stakeholders must craft a strategic path forward under the auspices of a common national communication strategy.
    Not so sure that it sure ever be approached as DOD strengthening a position IN National public diplomacy. The two need to be definitively different in both their approaches and who's pushing them. Somewhat of a slippery slope there which pols might pull mil in whence they do not belong. That said the second part; NOT acting alone and making sure there is a common strategy and path forward is where DOD belongs as it is one of the largest stakeholders in that strategies success or failure; seems on the right track.
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

Similar Threads

  1. Human Terrain & Anthropology (merged thread)
    By SWJED in forum Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious
    Replies: 944
    Last Post: 02-06-2016, 06:55 PM
  2. Social Media and Unconventional Warfare
    By Bill Moore in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 12:39 PM
  3. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 11:51 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •