Results 1 to 20 of 434

Thread: Georgia's South Ossetia Conflict - Political Commentary

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Humphrey View Post
    Has anyone else noticed that the cold wars back and getting warmer by the minute.
    Yeah. For some time I was almost missing the good old days...until they came back. Now I'm starting to recall a little about why we were somewhat on edge back then. Funny, the last few weeks I've been thinking forget China/Taiwan/South China Sea as the likeliest theatre for the next potential big conventional war, it's Eastern Europe - Ukraine above all - that we should be worrying about. Guess Georgia may form a prelude.

  2. #2
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Question Maybe

    Quote Originally Posted by Norfolk View Post
    Yeah. For some time I was almost missing the good old days...until they came back. Now I'm starting to recall a little about why we were somewhat on edge back then. Funny, the last few weeks I've been thinking forget China/Taiwan/South China Sea as the likeliest theatre for the next potential big conventional war, it's Eastern Europe - Ukraine above all - that we should be worrying about. Guess Georgia may form a prelude.
    But I wouldn't necessarily look to others not counting their chickens before they've hatched. Noone has ever gotten everything they wanted and it those details within which the devils reside

    I just hope the planners on the various sides have considered how this type of thing generally tends to leave the planned path quickly.
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Humphrey View Post
    I just hope the planners on the various sides have considered how this type of thing generally tends to leave the planned path quickly.
    But Ron, making a sober assessment of what you would like (and may actually be capable of) to do, what the enemy may (and might be capable of doing) also do, and how it may all turn to liquid state anyway takes all the fun out of planning and starting wars. After all, no one likes a party-pooper. (But maybe we should listen to them anyway, perhaps....)

  4. #4
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Arrow I know

    Quote Originally Posted by Norfolk View Post
    But Ron, making a sober assessment of what you would like (and may actually be capable of) to do, what the enemy may (and might be capable of doing) also do, and how it may all turn to liquid state anyway takes all the fun out of planning and starting wars. After all, no one likes a party-pooper.
    But these days I've just about reached my RK stage,

    Can't we all just get along!
    - Rodney King
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  5. #5
    i pwnd ur ooda loop selil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Belly of the beast
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    I'm no expert but isn't it likely that this is as much a cold war tactic of proxy statism? The United States sits in the middle of Iraq and Afghanistan with first strike capability against every middle eastern well head. The Russians can look at that with a fairly malevolent eye. I don't believe for a minute that moving into Ossetia is about patriotism. With the Move into South Ossetia and the ability to now role right over Armenia and Azerbejizian (sp?) that puts the soviets into a stronger position to forestall US adventurism into Iran. It looks like simple barrier and balance diplomacy. The continuing assault only strengthens my supposition. I know go hide under my rock. I won't even mention that RBN used cyber war in this conflict EXACTLY like I said it could be used years ago.
    Sam Liles
    Selil Blog
    Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
    The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
    All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Hey Ken ... Possibly, GA was occupying areas

    occupied by Georgian ethnic populations (1/5 to 1/3 of So. Ossetia pop., depending on source).

    http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/...tia-Glance.php
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_South_Ossetia_War
    http://www.forcedmigration.org/guides/fmo001/fmo001.pdf

    Insert to Fuchs' map showing (orange) areas controlled by Georgia 7 Aug looks more like an patchwork, possibly following river valleys (seems so, from SO2 map below).

    That insert has some resemblence to the agency's ethnic map for Caucasian region, but the latter is at too small a scale to match exact areas in the insert.

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Im...sus-ethnic.jpg

    Here is a blowup of the Georgian-controlled areas (ultimate source ?)

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...s/d/d1/SO2.jpg

    The map (post by kaur #40) has the villages identified (Geo vs Oss). Looks like a GA march north to the Roki Tunnel would have been an uphill climb through unfriendly (Oss) mountain country. Remind you of another war a long time ago ?

    So, perhaps the GA deployed in an effort to protect their own by being there - a noble political thought, but maybe not the best plan to repel an invasion. Wasn't ARVN strung out something like that at the end ?

    Which goes to prove that, if one (JMM) has no experience in an area; and has incomplete maps re: troops, population, etc. - one be a-guessin big time in reaching any military or political conclusion.

    PS1: Rus Maps (link by kaur # 38) has topo maps (slow dl) + a cute little Velo Gal for you youngsters. Also has an English page linked, with same Velo Gal.

    http://www.topomaps.eu/

    PS2: For anyone out there who might be a cold war lover, multi-beaked birds can still fly on both sides.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    I found one nice radio broadcast in Russian. Lady is famous Russian journalist and she explains the situation in the whole North Caucasus very well. You have to use google translator again. Would you paste to Google window

    Эхо Москвы / Передачи / Код доступа / Суббота, 09.08.2008

    and use 1 link's "translate this page"

  8. #8
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Generally, the understanding of what they're criticizing is superficial or ill-informed (as was your comment I quoted here and a few others over the past weeks) and -- this is important -- we don't really care what you think but are willing to mention some things you might not have thought of.
    Yeah, right. You don't know whom or what arguments I'm talking about, but you know they're wrong. Looks like a holy cow rests on the road ahead.


    @Wilf;
    I see some possible excuses for the Georgians that would not imply operational incompetence. Instead, they imply political incompetence.
    I've seen lots of info right now that hint at successful provocations by Russia (via its proxy SO) prior to this hot war phase (even including artillery attacks on Georgian settlements).
    It looks like Saakashvili took the bait, and he did it in a way that gave the Russians an easy opportunity for intervention.

    It reminds me a lot of mid-19th century to pre-WWI politics.

    -----

    About the map; it looks pretty similar to Bosnian war maps and also a bit reminiscent of Sino-Japanese War maps.
    The Russian advance guard smashed right through the main Georgian enclave early on - that was probably already the decision of the war.
    The last info that I got is that the Russians advanced beyond SO to the next Georgian city. It looks like they want to increase pressure on the Georgian government till it resigns.

  9. #9
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    @Wilf;
    I see some possible excuses for the Georgia that would not imply operational incompetence. Instead, they imply political incompetence.
    I've seen lots of info right now that hint at successful provocations by Russia (via its proxy SO) prior to this hot war phase (even including artillery attacks on Georgian settlements).
    It looks like Saakashvili took the bait, and he did it in a way that gave the Russians an easy opportunity for intervention.

    It reminds me a lot of mid-19th century to pre-WWI politics.
    I'm not sure the Gruzynim are as stupid as some may think. If Georgia ends up in NATO, with US bases on it's soil, it may make things look a bit different.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  10. #10
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Well, that won't happen without losing SO and Abchasia.
    The European governments said pretty clearly that they don't want a new ally who has territorial disputes involving Russia. Especially not one who doesn't add any relevant advantages to NATO.

    The best the Georgians can hope for without losing SO and Abchasia officially is probably a bilateral alliance with the USA.
    I wonder why the USA didn't offer such an alliance after it tried (unsuccessfully) to get Georgia into NATO. GWB looked committed to offer Georgia an alliance, but didn't go the whole distance after NATO partners declined.

    BTW, I don't think they are necessarily stupid - politicians have to re-learn alliance building politics and serious national security politics nowadays.
    It's not 19th century anymore when the whole world was so volatile and full of great power games that foreign policy was a lot about these things.

  11. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,099

    Default

    For those interested, the RFE/RL Crisis in South Ossetia page has a slew of analytic articles, backgrounders, a timeline, and a multimedia reporting......

Similar Threads

  1. North Korea: catch all thread
    By SWJED in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 408
    Last Post: 04-24-2015, 03:17 PM
  2. Replies: 141
    Last Post: 08-30-2012, 09:23 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 02:38 PM
  4. Conflict Analysis
    By Jedburgh in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-24-2007, 04:10 PM
  5. Vietnam's Forgotten Lessons
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 11:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •