SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Other U.S. GWOT > OEF - Philippines

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2007   #1
sgmgrumpy
Council Member
 
sgmgrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Leavenworth Kansas
Posts: 168
Default Case Studies of Pacification in the Philippines

Quote:
The Combat Studies Institute (CSI) is a military history 'think tank' which produces timely and relevant military history research publications and contemporary operational history for the U.S. Army. CSI also conducts battlefield staff rides and provides other types of educational and historical support to Army units and commands upon request. CSI consists of six divisions: the Research & Publications Team, the Staff Ride Team, the Contemporary Operations Studies Team, the Military History Instructional Support Team, the Combined Arms Center Command Historian Office, and the Frontier Army Museum.

Now available:

OP 24: Savage Wars of Peace: Case Studies of Pacification in the Phillippines, 1900-1902

Last edited by sgmgrumpy; 09-28-2007 at 03:23 PM.
sgmgrumpy is offline  
Old 09-28-2007   #2
Rex Brynen
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,599
Default

OP 24: Savage Wars of Peace: Case Studies of Pacification in the Phillippines, 1900-1902 [/QUOTE]

I must say the term "pacification" gives me the chills.

In fairness, the body of the report correctly notes that this was seen as a "war of conquest" by the Filipinos. However, I think the author and/or CSI missed a real opportunity in not subtitling this "Case Studies of Colonial Conquest in the Phillippines" -- especially given that the perception of the US as an outside, neocolonial force is a key element in the moral terrain of the current insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan (something that I think needs to be more fully grasped throughout the USG).
Rex Brynen is offline  
Old 10-01-2007   #3
pinoyme
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Default Filipino reaction

Hi:

As a Filipino, I am not too comfortable reading this account.

As I had much earlier said in this forum, exposure to accounts of the Fil-American War has often been the entry point to the radicalization of Filipino college students.

This is very bad politics. All opposed to the United States could cite this account as yet additional proof that the US is an imperialist country.

Incidentally, the Philippine revolution is taught in many colleges in my country as the very first nationalist revolution in Asia.And the Fil-American War, the latter part of this revolution, which failed and must be continued.

The term continued is subject to many interpretations--peaceful ones included.

Last edited by pinoyme; 10-01-2007 at 05:26 AM. Reason: i missed a clincher
pinoyme is offline  
Old 10-01-2007   #4
Steve Blair
Moderator
 
Steve Blair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,195
Default

I must say the term "pacification" gives me the chills.

In fairness, the body of the report correctly notes that this was seen as a "war of conquest" by the Filipinos. However, I think the author and/or CSI missed a real opportunity in not subtitling this "Case Studies of Colonial Conquest in the Phillippines" -- especially given that the perception of the US as an outside, neocolonial force is a key element in the moral terrain of the current insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan (something that I think needs to be more fully grasped throughout the USG).[/QUOTE]

Agreed. It could also be seen as the maturation of tactics developed on the plains, since the great majority of the officers engaged in the Philippines learned their trade in the Frontier Army. Interesting parallel...the army we sent to the Philippines (at least in terms of officers and NCOs) was possibly the most combat-experienced we fielded before the current time.
__________________
"On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War
Steve Blair is offline  
Old 10-02-2007   #5
pinoyme
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Default on pacification of the philippines

Hi:

In case Americans have forgotten, teach-ins against the Vietnam War involved teach-ins also on the Fil-Amercian War with "Little Brown Brother" as the favored book.

Insurgency is a war where "politics takes command." The CSI appears to have forgotten this fact.

And this comes from a poster like me who did have relatives who served with the Philippine Scouts. As a member of the middle class, I also do have have relatives in the US who are doing well there.
pinoyme is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Searching for Case Studies dabruzzino RFIs & Members' Projects 1 11-20-2009 10:02 PM
Iraq Isn't the Philippines SWJED OEF - Philippines 38 01-26-2007 07:21 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation