Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious

Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious Applying the soft sciences and higher laws.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2014   #61
Council Member
TheCurmudgeon's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 1,117

Originally Posted by Red Rat View Post
Pertinent tweet from an Islamic State (IS) affiliated Twitter account.

The context of the conversation was comment on IS nascent air capabilities and their probable lack of necessary logistical support. An unsolicited response received was (verbatim):

"we taught u u a lesson in how a trained Heart doesn't fail. Unfortunately u didnt pass"

Clearly for many in IS this is a religious war, which to my mind puts the political dynamic closer to that which the Israelis perceive in their dealings with Hamas. This is not a battlespace (political or military) which the West appears comfortable in dealing with. As Alastair Campbell said with regards to the then British Prime Minister Tony Blair: "We don't do God".
It is not that we "don't do God", western states cannot legitimize a religious war. We can legitimize a war for freedom. Freedom is what we are willing to fight and die for. We can replace oppression with freedom. It is harder to replace religion with freedom. I would argue that it is impossible to do by an outside source.

The result is that we are fighting two different conflicts, almost fighting past each other. Western states with their quasi-religious belief in freedom as the cure for all political ills and groups like ISIS who use religion to legitimize both their war and their rule. In any case, the result is a war without end, because we can never control the ultimate battle space, the support of the population if our aim is to give them freedom. Freedom does not include forcing them to give up or modify their religious beliefs.

The ultimate result is war without end ... at least as long as you see force as a way to de-ligitimize religion and "impose" freedom. There are things that have to occur from within.

Which brings me around to my questions/comment. The only countries that currently attempt to impose freedom are countries with a judo-christian history. I could argue that Christianity is a "individualistic" religion in that each individual is capable to reaching salvation based on their own individual life choices (depending on which parts of the bible one consults). Does that matter?
"I can change almost anything ... but I can't change human nature."

Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan

Last edited by TheCurmudgeon; 07-26-2014 at 11:09 PM.
TheCurmudgeon is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chaplains as Liaisons with Religious Leaders: Lessons From Iraq and Afghanistan Jedburgh Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious 156 01-15-2015 04:27 AM
We need less Chemo and Surgery and more "Voom." Bob's World Catch-All, GWOT 115 12-10-2012 04:13 AM
Paper: Rethinking Role of Religious Conflict in Doctrine Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious 46 01-18-2010 03:01 AM
Civilian Casualties, Religion, and COIN Operations rborum Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious 53 07-29-2009 07:17 PM
Islam, The Solution...!? SWJED Global Issues & Threats 5 09-10-2007 09:14 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation