SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Adversary / Threat

Adversary / Threat One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Talk about (or with?) them.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2011   #1
SWJ Blog
Council Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10,995
Default Space operations and thinking (merged thread)

This Week at War: Lost in Space

Entry Excerpt:

Can the Pentagon afford to protect its orbital interests?

Here is the latest edition of my column at Foreign Policy:

Topics include:

1) Will diplomacy and soft power be enough to defend space?

2) How many nukes does Pakistan need?

Will diplomacy and soft power be enough to defend space?

The U.S. Department of Defense released its first-ever National Security Space Strategy (NSSS), on Feb. 4. The document "seeks to maintain and enhance the national security benefits" the United States derives from its activities and capabilities in space. This week, Gregory Schulte, deputy assistant secretary of defense for space policy, explained the new policy in an essay for Foreign Policy. Schulte described the benefits the United States receives from a wide variety of surveillance, communications, and navigation satellites. He also noted the increasing competition among a growing number of players who are seeking their own advantageous positions in orbit. Schulte explained some clever diplomatic and soft-power strategies that U.S. officials hope will protect the country's space interests, along with some hedges in case the soft-power strategies fail. However, growing those hedges could get very expensive for the Pentagon.

Of greatest worry to the Pentagon is the vulnerability of its satellites to attack. In 2007, China shot down one of its old weather satellites with a direct-ascent missile, demonstrating its ability to threaten the space systems on which U.S. military forces depend. In addition to missile attack, many commercial and Defense Department satellites are also vulnerable to directed energy (laser) attack and to electronic jamming. U.S. adversaries may view attacks on U.S. satellites as a high-payoff/low-risk strategy. By attacking U.S. satellites, an adversary could hobble U.S. military forces without the usual indications of warfare, at least in the public's perception. For example, without any images of explosions, burning buildings, or wounded civilians, U.S. policymakers might find it difficult to generate political and diplomatic support for a military response.

Click below to read more ...



--------
Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.
SWJ Blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #3
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,424
Default MPs warn over nuclear space bombs and solar flares

Quote:
The government must take more seriously the threat of a nuclear weapon being exploded in space by a rogue state, MPs have warned.

The Defence Select Committee said the resulting radiation pulse could disrupt power and water supplies, UK defence and satellite navigation systems.

Its chairman, Tory MP James Arbuthnot, said an attack was "quite likely".

The committee is urging ministers to invest in more "hardened" technology to cope with such an event.

It looked at the threat to the UK's technological infrastructure from "electromagnetic pulse" (EMP) events in space, which could also include the eruption of solar flares.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17117836
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #4
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

That's a 30 year old scare. It was questionable in regard to the USSR and is an idiocy indicator when used in combination with terrorists or Iran etc etc

Jason Sigger battled the scaremongers for a while:

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-crazies.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...l-reports.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...emp-crazy.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...to-senate.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...-of-crazy.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...iscussion.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-crazies.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...concerned.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...t-company.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-threats.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-effects.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...to-europe.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...es-attack.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...out-there.html

and more, more, more...

Or this
http://dickdestiny.com/blog1/2010/06...ok-and-others/



I own an old book from about 1982, compiled by the FAS or some other scientists organisation (didn't see the book in a while). The chapter on EMP from 1982 mentioned that 4 500 kt (or was it 1 Mt?) warheads exploding in a patter over the U.S. at hundreds of kilometres altitude would have a good, but not at all all-frying effect on electronics.
It was a secondary concern when the USSR had thousands of nukes and operational SSBNs. It's a ridiculous concern now.
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #5
tequila
Council Member
 
tequila's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,665
Default

Generally speaking, if Newt Gingrich is exercised about it, it's not worth worrying about.
tequila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #6
J Wolfsberger
Council Member
 
J Wolfsberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 806
Default

Well, the article at the BBC was written by someone with only a little knowledge of nuclear weapons, Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) or Coronal Mass Ejections (CME). It pretty much reduces to "something bad could happen and somebody ought to do something about it." (Which is typical of FAS scaremongering.)

That said ...

Nuclear weapons could be used to generate a High-altitude Electro-Magnetic Pulse (HEMP) that would destroy or degrade a lot of electrical and electronic systems. How much and how widespread depends on the design and installation of the electrical/electronic device/system and the structure of the attack. The kind of damage the good MP is concerned about would take a pretty sophisticated attack. The yields and launch systems required rule out all but the US, Russia, and China. (Possibly the UK and France could be included.) The idea that a rogue state, such as N. Korea or Iran, could do that is ... bizarre.

CME is a serious threat, largely because the standard approaches to protecting electrical systems from everyday events, such as surges and lightening strikes, would be turned into a vulnerability. However, with sufficient warning, which we would have, the damage can be minimized by simply shutting down the power grid for a few to tens of hours. (Look up the Carrington Event, which was a CME striking the Earth.)
__________________
John Wolfsberger, Jr.

An unruffled person with some useful skills.
J Wolfsberger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #7
Entropy
Council Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tequila View Post
Generally speaking, if Newt Gingrich is exercised about it, it's not worth worrying about.
Haha.

I really don't get the EMP crazies.
__________________
Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.
Entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012   #8
Mipeck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Default Aircraft Carriers in Space

An interview with a real naval analyst on what science fiction gets right and wrong on space warfare: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...riers_in_space

Michael

Last edited by davidbfpo; 2 Days Ago at 07:01 PM. Reason: 6,907v when a stand alone thread
Mipeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2014   #9
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,424
Default

Electromagnetic Warfare Is Here
A briefcase-size radio weapon could wreak havoc in our networked world
http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/m...arfare-is-here
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017   #10
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,424
Default USAF Space Chief Sees Final Frontier as Battleground

Quote:
Space, once seen as the benign final frontier, has evolved into a crowded potential battleground that the U.S. must defend as conflicts extend beyond Earth, according to the Air Force’s top military space official.

While officials once aspired to treat space as a peaceful refuge from the strife on Earth, it’s now “congested, contested and competitive”-- and “all three of those trends are trending upward,” General John W. “Jay” Raymond, the head of the Air Force Space Command, said in an interview Monday at Bloomberg headquarters in New York.

From jamming and cyber attacks to “kinetic destruction,” there’s a “full range of threats” to U.S. early warning, Global Positioning System and communications satellites, Raymond said. Those threats come from economic and military rivals like China and Russia and include the increasing accumulation of debris orbiting the planet.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-battleground


Most-Relevant pre-existing thread, now moribund.
http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ighlight=space
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018   #11
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,424
Default Space Operations

Because we need to be thinking in three dimensions, a stand-alone post until it's not.

Rhetorical question: incompetence or shenanigans?

Quote:
A U.S. spy satellite that was launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida, aboard a SpaceX rocket on Sunday failed to reach orbit and is assumed to be a total loss, two U.S. officials briefed on the mission said on Monday.
The classified intelligence satellite, built by Northrop Grumman Corp, failed to separate from the second stage of the Falcon 9 rocket and is assumed to have broken up or plunged into the sea, said the two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The satellite is assumed to be "a write-off," one of the officials said.
The presumed loss of the satellite was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...als/ar-BBI8tMs

For further reference, consult this currently locked thread
USAF Space Chief Sees Final Frontier as Battleground
http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=26092
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Days Ago   #12
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,424
Default

Russia and China are developing 'destructive' space weapons, US intelligence warns
Quote:
Russia and China could soon possess "destructive" space weapons that could be used against the U.S., according to American intelligence agencies.
The two United Nations Security Council members are pursuing such "anti-satellite weapons as a means to reduce U.S. and allied military effectiveness," the report said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/14/russ...elligence.html
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

Last edited by davidbfpo; 2 Days Ago at 09:29 PM. Reason: 25,554v
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
buzz lightyear games

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TE Lawrence: a merged thread SWJED Historians 117 05-13-2017 02:15 PM
Tips to Information Operations Michael C Media, Information & Cyber Warriors 13 12-14-2010 02:11 AM
Assessment of Effects Based Operations SWJED Futurists & Theorists 140 05-03-2009 07:00 AM
Rethinking “IO:” Complex Operations in the Information Age SWJED Media, Information & Cyber Warriors 1 07-05-2008 01:13 AM
Non Kinetic surge capacity for COIN operations BronwenM Doctrine & TTPs 5 08-03-2007 09:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation