Hi Steve
Quite possibly . Let me give you what I consider to be another example of a trans-national insurgency (I like the term): the anti-globalization movement. I think that an argument could also be made that many of the diasporic communities that have come into existence as a result of political conflict in their homelands may, at times, also act as trans-national insurgencies (TNIs), even though hey may have a geographic focus.
Hmmm, maybe that's a way to distinguish them: their focus - geographic, ideological, etc.
That's why I was identifying it as a "tactic", rather than an "aim".
I think that there is a difference; probably something to do with the degree of social integration of the "criminal organization". After all, the Mafia and gangs in general are really quite an accepted and integrated part of US society, whether anyone likes it or not <wry grin>. In effect, in a stable society, these groups fulfill functional requirements, i.e. they meet the needs, of a segment of the population even though the society in general has specifically said that these needs may not be met legally in that form. Usually, this is in the form of actions / needs that society has defined as "immoral".
In disorganized territories, I think we are dealing with something quite different - more of an attempt to both fulfill needs and, also, to carve out a moral sanction from the general society to do so.
Maybe we should start categorizing these groups in the following way:
Marc
- Aim or goal - what they hope to achieve
- Focus - geographic, ideological, "religious", economic, etc.
- Tactical preference - e.g. terrorism, "criminal activity", IO, etc.
Bookmarks