Precisely my point – mechanical clearing devices were designed for specific tasks and conditions. Operating them out of their intended environment merely reduces their effectiveness and leads some to believe they are useless. A lot more goes into leading a mechanical demining team than just driving or operating robots. The same can be said for choosing the right detector for the soil and target.
I guess that would depend on the vehicle’s application. I would not pretend to keep up with a convoy. I would however employ the vehicle sufficiently ahead of the convoy in a suspect area. I’m not advocating mechanical demining as a convoy protection vehicle, just another tool in the kit bag that has some proven advantages. Instead of riding around in an MRAP awaiting detonation, I suggest destroying an element that the enemy can no longer use.
Exactly – reduce the enemy’s options and save lives. You then have anecdotal evidence of mechanical demining not helping a patrol or convoy ? I'm unaware of this tactic ever being employed.
As the fastest system is made in Germany and you contend these machines are all slow, I’ll let you do your own homework
Yep, one square kilometer or 1,000 square meters.
As you may have feared, it can be remotely operated and, it's been around since 2001.It works at a maximum rate of nine meters per minute... at a rate of up to 1,000 square meters per hour under optimum conditions
... destroys mines faster than they can detonate
Bookmarks