SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Other, By Region > South Asia

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2014   #21
WGEwald
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Several people have been injured after Sikh groups brandishing swords clashed at India's Golden Temple as special prayers were held to mark the deadly military offensive there in 1984.

Reports said the fight at Sikhism's holiest shrine was over who would speak first at the ceremony and that a scuffle broke out over a microphone.

Footage showed men running down temple steps lashing out with their swords.

Reports said at least three people had been taken to hospital with injuries.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-27727812
WGEwald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2014   #22
Ray
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calcutta, India
Posts: 1,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
The widely respcted, former BBC India correspondent, Mark Tully gives his own memories of the time and reflects on what has happened since:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-disaster.html
Ah Sir Mark!

Lord Haw Haw.

Last edited by Ray; 06-07-2014 at 11:11 AM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2014   #23
Ray
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calcutta, India
Posts: 1,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WGEwald View Post
Good to see you here.

It is all politics and quest for supremacy.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2014   #24
WGEwald
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
Good to see you here.

It is all politics and quest for supremacy.
Swords are not allowed in the US Senate, but there was a time canes were allowed.

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/...les_Sumner.htm
WGEwald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2014   #25
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default Sword play

Many, many years ago on a MP-guided tour of the UK Parliament we were shown a coat rack for MPs, complete with tassles to hang swords on. In the House of Commons the front benches are just out of immediate sword range.

See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line and http://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/2013...om-parliament/
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2014   #26
Ray
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calcutta, India
Posts: 1,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WGEwald View Post
Swords are not allowed in the US Senate, but there was a time canes were allowed.

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/...les_Sumner.htm
Sikhs by religion are allowed to carry kirpans (small swords) and now they wear representative miniature swords.

But then, some feel that they are a law unto themselves.

Like you chaps are politically sensitive to racial terminology like the N word, in India, as you must have realised we have the same squeamishness when it comes to 'minorities'.

Check this out

THE LANGUAGE OF DIFFERENCE
- Social attitudes and their changing vocabularies
http://www.telegraphindia.com/archives/archive.html (Link may not work, see next post)

Note that in India one can speak out without fear or favour.

I am sure this article will get some angry and some placating responses in India.

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-08-2014 at 10:23 PM. Reason: add note re link
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2014   #27
WGEwald
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 25
Default

I could not use the link provided by BG Ray. This one worked for me.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/114060...p#.U5SnA41OVjo
WGEwald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2015   #28
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,028
Default India Grounds Most of Original Arjun Tanks

Quote:
NEW DELHI — Most of India's homemade Arjun Mark-1 battle tank fleet has been grounded because of technical snags and lack of imported components, an Indian Army official said.

"Nearly 75 percent of the 124 tanks with the Army are grounded," the official added.

The Army has inducted 124 Arjun Mark-1 tanks developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and produced by state-owned Heavy Vehicles Factory at Avadi in southern India. Nearly 55 percent of the value of the tank is imported components and those supplies have dried up, the official said.

The Army official did not give details of the technical snags but said there are more than 90 issues.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/def...drdo/70963382/
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2015   #29
blueblood
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamG View Post
Nothing surprising here. This is army doing whatever it can to scuttle further orders, to the extent that DRDO installed a black box to prevent army from sabotaging trials.

Arjun for all it's notoriety is not a bad machine. Comparative trails with T-90 showed Arjun can soundly beat T-90 in most performance parameters despite the odds stacked against it.

Below is a report by Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
(http://en.wikipedia.org wiki/Comptroller_and_Auditor_General_of_India).

http://i.imgur.com/6LE0Qcf.png
blueblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015   #30
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default Indian SOF strike across border into Burma

Last week in an unusual move Indian para-commandos attacked at least one Indian rebel camp, India rarely uses "hot pursuit". One wonders how Islamabad views this, especially if it considers using LeT again to attack India (shades of Mumbai).

The main thread on Indian insurgencies details recent heavy losses from rebel attacks:http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ead.php?t=2248

Link to a BBC news report:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-33074773

Ret'd Major-General Singh said:
Quote:
India has the capability for surgical strikes across our borders. The political will was missing so far...That may not be the case any more.
From a BBC analyst's commentary:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-33074776
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-23-2015 at 01:13 PM. Reason: Was in a stand alone thread now merged
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015   #31
omarali50
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 839
Default

Pakistani leaders and social media did get the message, and went ballistic in response. The general theme was "Pakistan is not Myanmar". That useless windbag and Bush's old friend, Pervez Musharraf, led the way as usual with bombastic statements about being willing to use nuclear weapons if India tried any "adventurism" (he actually said "we do not have these weapons for use as fireworks on Shab e barat", a night when some illumination and fireworks may happen in Pakistan).
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...w/47680996.cms

I do not keep up with them, but it is possible that some members of the Anatol Lieven school of Pakistan-analysis may also have stepped in to warn about the dangers posed by Modi's newfound aggressiveness.

Personally, I dont think any clash is imminent. The army has India-specific terrrorists on a short leash (otherwise they would have struck again since Mumbai) and "good GHQ" is not in the mood for any real confrontation with India. "Bad GHQ" may try something if they feel the good guys are about to make a serious dent in the Jihadi apparatus, but apparently that red line has not been crossed...yet.

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-23-2015 at 01:13 PM. Reason: Was in a stand alone thread now merged
omarali50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015   #32
omarali50
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 839
Default

Christine Fair (who was once labeled Christine Unfair by Hindutva fanatics because she said something that Pakistani PR people used against India) has an article on this topic:

http://warontherocks.com/2015/06/fal.../?singlepage=1

Her conclusion:

Quote:
In the wake of India’s hot pursuit of militants into Myanmar, Pakistan has raised numerous alarms about Indian aggression. It has issued various warnings that no such Indian incursion into Pakistan will be tolerated. As often happens in such circumstances, the international media has raised the tocsin of the potential for yet another “Indo-Pakistan” clash. Unfortunately, much of this coverage of the so-called India-Pakistan conflict is deeply problematic in that writers, perhaps with good intentions, seek to impose a false equivalence on both nations’ conduct, giving the impression that India and Pakistan contribute equally to the fraught situation that currently exists.
This is dangerously untrue and feeds into a policy-process that has failed to come to terms with the most serious problem in South Asia: Pakistan. Such coverage also rewards Pakistan for its malfeasance by attributing blame to India in equal share and thus legitimizing Pakistan’s ill-found grievances. The only parties who benefit from such an understanding of the “Indo-Pakistan” dispute are the Pakistan military and its terrorist proxies. One such article was published by the Washington Post on June 11 by Tim Craig and Annie Gowen. In this essay, I seek to provide the necessary historical and empirical background that is required to make sense of the current situation. In doing so I directly challenge such writers as Craig and Gowen, among others, to devote more time to understanding the conflict dynamics before they inadvertently obfuscate the situation more than they illuminate it.
Needless to say, this will "stoke tension" in South Asia..or at least in the Anatol Lieven school of analytics. I look forward to a healthy sparring match

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-23-2015 at 01:13 PM. Reason: fix quote. Was in a stand alone thread now merged
omarali50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015   #33
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default A 10% raid

A commentary 'Was India's special-forces raid into Myanmar a signal to China and Pakistan?' by Shashank Joshi, of RUSI (London), via the Australian Lowy Institute:http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/...Pakistan.aspx?

With my emphasis:
Quote:
In their book on the subject, retired Lieutenant General PC Katoch and journalist Saikat Datta note that India has over 20,000 special forces but 'one tenth' of US capabilities, as a result of inadequate officer numbers, training, intelligence, language skills, air support, and a lack of centralised command. In another recent paper, George Perkovich and Toby Dalton cite Indian experts, including retired officials, who acknowledge that 'India does not now have the capability to combine special operations in Pakistan with precision air support', notwithstanding highly localised raids across the Line of Control.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015   #34
blueblood
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
Default

@omarali50,
Quote:
Christine Fair (who was once labeled Christine Unfair by Hindutva fanatics because she said something that Pakistani PR people used against India) has an article on this topic:
Hindutvawadis are nice that way. If only you knew them better.

Frankly, most Pakistani commenters would have had slept better at night had Dr. Fair mentioned Mukti Bahini, RAW and 1971. So while I agree with it almost completely I also think this was a biased piece.

Clubbing India together with Pakistan does give a lot of leverage to "belligerent" elements. Mr. Ali, I have a few queries if you care to answer.

1) Why did Pakistani media consistently missed the part where firing on LOC from their side "coincidentally" matched with Kashmir elections and Samba and Kathua attacks but kept repeating the ISPR line of India creating distractions wrt Zarb-e-azb. This includes journalists like Najam Sethi who do not tow the Army's official line in general.

2) What part do you think army has played in the rise of Imran Khan and his future? While some say that Imran Khan is army's Plan B, Imran on record keeps or at least kept harping about the dangers that army bring by military operations across the country.

..............................................

https://twitter.com/majorlyp/status/608710075704860672

Something, most of us on this side of the border were thinking. You may find this person amusing, maybe.

As for Mushy, I think people are being too hard on him. From once the only world leader who carried a personal side arm, Mushy has turned into a senile old man whose every rants begins with the ritualistic "We are not ________. We are a nuclear power. India cannot do that to us"

Do Pakistanis ponder over the fact that would have happened had it been Nawaz as PM post 9/11?

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-23-2015 at 01:14 PM. Reason: word change. Was in a stand alone thread now merged
blueblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015   #35
blueblood
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
Default

@davidbfpo, while I am fan of Gen. P.C. Katoch, I am also struggling hard to reach a common ground with him lately. Over the years he has made some pretty unwarranted and some times just lame comments.

Having a tenth of US capability is not a bad thing if you realize that you are not US. Tenth of US capability means 1 Supercarrier and 7 nuclear submarines. It can also mean 18 F-22s, 2 B-2s and 20 C-17s. Not bad!!

But most of all it means a 20% increase against the current Indian defence budget. You can have 100% of US SOF capabilities when you can afford to spend as much as US.

For the paper (yet to read) that mentioned Indian SOFs inability to conduct ops in Pak is a very dated outlook. Let me get back to you on this one.

Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-23-2015 at 01:14 PM. Reason: Was in a stand alone thread now merged
blueblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015   #36
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default The most useful Indian sources: a guide

A useful guide to studying India's military by Shashank Joshi (RUSI) via WoTR, with a plethora oif links and recommendations:http://warontherocks.com/2015/06/so-.../?singlepage=1

Quote:
Formal study of India’s military isn’t at the same stage of maturity as that of the PLA. The most useful Indian sources — which vary greatly in quality — tend to be a small cluster of retired officers rather than scholars with academic training, and much of the Western literature still needs to be grounded in better military understanding. Western military research institutes — parts of RAND, the NDU, the Army War College — that dominate Peter Mattis’ reading list aren’t as interested in India, and Indian research institutes don’t yet have the capacity. But a wave of insightful and important articles and books, many by young scholars, is laying a solid foundation on which to build.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015   #37
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default Moderator's Note

There are two smaller relevant threads: Indian Intelligence at (with 6.5k views and 6 post - unlike that on ISI):http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=19898 and Understanding India's Insurgencies (33k views and 173 posts) at:http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ead.php?t=2248
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016   #38
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,899
Default India gets an untested nucler triad

Well I knew India was moving along, but I'd missed much of the detail. Notably having ICBMs.

This article poses three challenging questions:
Quote:
1.What role should India’s nuclear force play in deterring new threats in the land domain?

2. How should India manage regional seaborne nuclear deterrence?

3. How should a nuclear doctrinal review be conducted?
Link:http://defenceindepth.co/2016/03/18/...uclear-policy/
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
amritsar, burma, india, insurgency, pakistan, punjab, sikh, special forces

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Clausewitz Collection (merged thread) SWJED Futurists & Theorists 932 05-02-2017 08:30 PM
Gazing in the Congo (DRC): the dark heart of Africa (new title) Jedburgh Africa 797 04-25-2017 02:20 AM
French military (catch all) AdamG Europe 82 07-11-2016 10:08 PM
Crimes, War Crimes and the War on Terror davidbfpo Law Enforcement 600 03-03-2014 03:30 PM
MCOs and SSOs in the 2008 edition of FM 3-0 Operations Norfolk Doctrine & TTPs 11 03-17-2008 12:15 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation