SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Other, By Region > Americas

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2007   #1
Jedburgh
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,097
Default Bolivia’s Reforms: The Danger of New Conflicts

ICG, 8 Jan 07: Bolivia’s Reforms: The Danger of New Conflicts
Quote:
Bolivia’s first indigenous president, Evo Morales, will complete a year in office on 22 January amid rising civil unrest. His government and its opponents are locked in confrontation over institutional reforms that would rewrite the constitution, end an inequitable land tenure system and return economic power to the state. Extremists are coming to the fore in both camps in a crisis that differs from previous ones because the stakes involve a proposal for a very different national model that the traditional elites see as a fundamental threat to their survival. Unless menacing rhetoric ends and dialogue, mediation and compromise begin immediately, widespread violence may result in 2007....
Jedburgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014   #2
Bill Moore
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,945
Default Bolivia (catch all)

This is a short and interesting story that demonstrates developing nations can still push back against U.S. hegemonic behavior. We insist on fighting the misnamed war on drugs beyond our shores instead of addressing demand as Morales argues, and no doubt this creates a negative perception of the U.S. as we meddle in their internal affairs.

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/...Q3YE6mM.reddit

Quote:
I have no regrets - in fact, I am pleased to have expelled the US ambassador, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and to have closed the US military base in Bolivia. Now, without a US ambassador, there is less conspiracy, and more political stability and social stability. Without the International Monetary Fund, we are better off economically.
I don't agree with the following comment, but I can certainly see why others on the receiving end would perceive it that way. I think we just arrogantly assume everyone will want to do things our way.

Quote:
He says: "It [drug trafficking] must be fought - we are convinced of that - and we are doing so more effectively and more wisely. When the United States was in control of counternarcotics, the US governments used drug trafficking for purely geopolitical purposes .... The US uses drug trafficking and terrorism for political control .... We have nationalised the fight against drug trafficking. "
Bill Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK military problems & policies SWJED Europe 258 04-11-2017 04:49 PM
French urban rioting (catch all) SWJED Europe 37 02-22-2017 09:02 AM
India's military (catch all) omarali50 South Asia 37 03-18-2016 06:04 PM
The Pashtun factor (catch all) Entropy OEF - Afghanistan 53 04-26-2014 02:12 PM
Don't Send a Lion to Catch a Mouse SWJED Futurists & Theorists 23 03-15-2007 11:46 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation