SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Other U.S. GWOT > OEF - Afghanistan

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2013   #21
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,648
Default

An attempt to present clues on what is going on in Kabul over a SOFA:http://www.natowatch.org/node/952
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013   #22
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,648
Default Quagmire for SOFA

From FP:
Quote:
Afghan President Hamid Karzai has called off all talks with the U.S. on the status of U.S. forces there after 2014 until the Taliban agree to meet with him.
That is finesse Afghan-style and makes any planning fraught.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013   #23
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,648
Default Back to Wardak: Karzai's turn now

From a short NYT report:
Quote:
Afghan officials confirmed Sunday that they had arrested and were questioning Zakaria Kandahari, whom they have described as an Afghan-American interpreter responsible for torturing and killing civilians while working for an American Special Forces unit.

The bodies of 10 victims were found near the Special Forces base beginning in April, after the Americans left; the last was discovered on June 4, according to Afghan forensic investigators and relatives of the victims. They had disappeared between November and February.
Link:http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/08/wo..._20130708&_r=0

I assume being in the "care" of the NDS, in a suspected torture facility, will mean a full admission will be forthcoming.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013   #24
Madhu
Council Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 154
Default "Zero Option"

Quote:
The latest source of Obama-Karzai friction: New U.S. peace talks with the Taliban.

Administration officials have discussed the possibility of the so-called "zero option" in Afghanistan throughout the year.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/theova...roops/2501165/

Pat Lang on the SOFA:

Quote:
Karzai is not running for another term. He will leave office on a date that roughly coincides with the end of NATOs mandate in his country and Obama's stated intention to withdraw. Karzai clearly holds the US and its "leadership" in amused contampt.
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_s...08287html.html

I'm afraid I've "lost the plot" a bit.
Madhu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2013   #25
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,648
Default

Our occasional, non-member contributor Hamid Hussain has provided a commentary on the attachment.
Attached Files
File Type: doc Blank2013.doc (34.0 KB, 46 views)
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2013   #26
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,648
Default SOFA becomes a Bilateral Security Agreement

I think the title is correct:
Quote:
Both Afghan and United States officials have, until now, been tight-lipped as to what is in the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) – which is to be scrutinised by a consultative loya jirga beginning on 21 November. If signed, it will govern the post-2014 deployment of US soldiers in Afghanistan. On Saturday, 16 November 2013, the President’s national security advisor, Rangin Dadfar Spanta, and the chief of the Afghan National Army, General Sher Mohammad Karimi, briefed Parliament on the draft, giving everyone the first solid information of what the two governments have agreed – including the numbers of troops and bases. As AAN’s Kate Clark and Ehsan Qaane report, the officials got a mixed reception from MPs.
Link:http://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/...efs-parliament

I expect this is the key point for Afghans and Americans, especially those who may serve in Afghanistan:
Quote:
From January 2015, the US military will conduct no operation on Afghan territory unless the Afghan government requests it.

US soldiers who commit crimes on Afghan soil will be prosecuted according to US law. Spanta said they had tried hard to convince the US not to insist on their soldiers having, as he put it, “judicial immunity” (masuniyat-e qaza’i) (he later corrected himself under an MP’s questioning, saying soldiers would not be immune, but would fall under sole US legal jurisdiction). Afghan attempts to get American soldiers alleged to have committed crimes tried according to Afghan law, he said, had failed and Afghanistan, therefore, had two options: accept this condition and sign the BSA or reject this condition and not sign it.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defending Hamdan jmm99 Law Enforcement 35 05-22-2011 06:36 AM
Afghanistan: A Silk Road Strategy gbramlet Blog Watch 1 03-15-2011 06:17 AM
Agricultural Component of the Afghanistan Surge? Surferbeetle OEF - Afghanistan 72 01-20-2011 03:33 PM
NATO's Afghanistan Challenge Ray OEF - Afghanistan 38 05-30-2007 09:10 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation