Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Combined Arms Center SAMS papers 2013

  1. #1
    Council Member gute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    322

    Default Combined Arms Center SAMS papers 2013

    The Combined Arms Center Digital Library just posted papers from the 2013 School of Advanced Military Studies class http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/

    I read the paper on infantry squad over match and found the conclusions to be ho hum. Why is a major writing about over match capabilities of the 9-man infantry squad?

  2. #2
    Council Member 82redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USAWC, Carlisle Bks
    Posts
    224

    Default

    You mean besides the obvious that the Chief of Staff made it his #1 priority?

    I'll grant that the conclusions are pretty weak. You have to remember that SAMS is an organization in continual conflict between the academic and the military, and the organization of its papers reflects the need to maintain academic accreditation balanced with spreading military acumen.

    I think that the conclusions, although not fully developed, are actually a good reminder for the US Army, which has a tradition of overlooking the human dimension and working for push-button, material solutions. That will work for the AF and the Navy, which are equipment centric, and to some extent for certain Army branches/organizations (Aviation, Armor and Field Artillery are all, to greater or lesser extent, equipment centric, too). The Infantry, however, can never become equipment centric- they remain the most basic, human element of combat. Starship Troopers lays this out pretty well, and Infantry Soldiers will always have to be led into combat successfully, they can never be managed there. To me, that is the core of the 2 case studies- the leaders (SFC Monti and SSG Goggins).

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    223

    Default SAMS used to produce operational planners/thinkers

    Is that no longer the case?

  4. #4
    Council Member 82redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USAWC, Carlisle Bks
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eden View Post
    Is that no longer the case?
    The SAMS mission is "The School of Advanced Military Studies educates members of our Armed Forces, our Allies, and the Interagency at the graduate level to become agile and adaptive leaders who are critical and creative thinkers who produce viable options to solve operational and strategic problems."

    Still focused on operational plans.

    That said, a shift in focus from equipment to leadership as the central point of achieving overmatch for the squad is an operational problem- changing the culture of the Army's procurement bureaucracy.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Personally I find the Command and General Staff College papers to be more interesting in terms of both subject matter and student capability.


    Postscript;


    Having said that this one caught my eye.
    Last edited by Tukhachevskii; 09-06-2013 at 01:34 PM.

  6. #6
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    I've read plenty such monographs and they all appear to be less about the content than about the grey matter exercise for the author.

    It's striking how rarely such papers include any gems, any fascinating original thought. They do contain lengthy military history chapters describing not so much the particularly interesting events and ideas, but rather a chronological development. This is about the least original you can do in regard to independent writing on such subjects.

    The few original monographs are regularly outlandish, such as some air mechanization paper years ago, for example.

    The most embarrassing monograph I've ever seen in such archives was about the German army's operational fashion of '96: It was an English summary of a German conference document made by a German visiting officer. I possess the German original, and can attest he did not add the slightest bit of original thought or critical thought to his paper.


    Compare for example the 2013 SAMS paper on cavalry 'Mechanized cavalry groups: lessons for the future of reconnaissance and surveillance':http://www.ausa.org/SiteCollectionDo...ers/LWP_53.pdf with the excellent 'Trading the Saber for Stealth:Can Surveillance Technology Replace Traditional Aggressive Reconnaissance?':http://www.ausa.org/SiteCollectionDo...ers/LWP_53.pdf

    Most papers which were written because officers were required to write them (instead of intrinsically driven to it) are useless to other people than the authors.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 09-06-2013 at 08:19 PM. Reason: Fix links after confusion being reported

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tukhachevskii View Post
    Personally I find the Command and General Staff College papers to be more interesting in terms of both subject matter and student capability.


    Postscript;


    Having said that this one caught my eye.
    As in the MA and MSc papers (obviously they're all on the CGSC website mea culpa)

  8. #8
    Council Member gute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Point taken - obviously I missed the obvious.

Similar Threads

  1. Leading infantry tactics theoreticians/experts today
    By Fuchs in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 01-31-2012, 09:16 AM
  2. help with bibliography: national liberation to netwar
    By brendan in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 04:41 PM
  3. Combined Arms Center Annual Research Index - 2006
    By SWJED in forum Catch-All, Military Art & Science
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2007, 09:13 PM
  4. Army Combined Arms Center (CAC)
    By DDilegge in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2005, 05:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •