SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious

Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious Applying the soft sciences and higher laws.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2010   #1
Rex Brynen
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,599
Default The Future of War

Richard Ned Lebow has an interesting piece in the journal International Relations, arguing major interstate war will become increasingly less likely:

Quote:
The Past and Future of War
Richard Ned Lebow
Abstract

An original data set of wars from 1648 to the present indicates that security and material interest are rarely the principal motives for war for rising, great or dominant powers. These states far more often go to war for reasons of standing. The empirical evidence offers no support for power transition, balance of power, Marxist or rationalist theories of war. The frequency of war between and among rising, great and dominant powers is likely to decline precipitously because the most important motives for war in the past standing, security, revenge, material interests and domestic politics are, for the most part, no longer served effectively by war. Changes in ideas, not changes in material conditions, are primarily responsible for this transformation.
I can't post the whole thing, but folks with online institutional access to the journal can access it here.
__________________
They mostly come at night. Mostly.
Rex Brynen is offline  
Old 09-21-2010   #2
SethB
Council Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CenTex
Posts: 222
Default

That argument is commonly made in interbellum periods.
SethB is offline  
Old 09-21-2010   #3
Adam L
Council Member
 
Adam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYS
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SethB View Post
That argument is commonly made in interbellum periods.
Very true. This argument is specious, and even if true nieve. One should never underestimate societies ability to find new justifications for conflict.

Adam L
Adam L is offline  
Old 09-21-2010   #4
Starbuck
Council Member
 
Starbuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sackets Harbor NY
Posts: 59
Default

D'oh...$25 for non-members.
Starbuck is offline  
Old 09-21-2010   #5
Rex Brynen
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam L View Post
Very true. This argument is specious, and even if true nieve. One should never underestimate societies ability to find new justifications for conflict.

Adam L
The argument is actually made on the basis of 450 years of quantitative data--in other words, interbellum periods are part of the data set. Indeed, interbellum periods didn't substantially exist until post-1815, so Lebow would probably argue that the fact that they even exist now buttresses his findings.

What he doesn't do, however, is code for war severity. And he only deals with major power wars.
__________________
They mostly come at night. Mostly.
Rex Brynen is offline  
Old 09-22-2010   #6
Adam L
Council Member
 
Adam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYS
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Brynen View Post
The argument is actually made on the basis of 450 years of quantitative data--in other words, interbellum periods are part of the data set.
I understand that. I am simply agreeing that it is during interbellum periods that there is almost always a continuous stream of argumentation that "major state" warfare is on the decline.

I have a great many problems with Lebow's work (not just this one in particular.) I'll try to make time in the next couple of days to read the article in detail and hopefully articulate my thoughts (if I can get enough sleep .) Let's just say that I have a great many problems with his "quantitative data."

Adam L

Last edited by Adam L; 09-22-2010 at 03:09 AM.
Adam L is offline  
Old 09-04-2012   #7
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

I do often remind others that Germany lived in peace for 43 years until the #### did hit the fan and WW1 broke out.
We had only (comparably few) colonial conflicts with indigenous people (few tribes) during that period.

It did not help my grand-grandfather's generation in 1914.
Fuchs is offline  
Old 09-07-2012   #8
Jimbo
Council Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Land of The Morning Calm
Posts: 177
Default

Arguements about shared economic interests (pre-WWI) or sociological/ideological hopefulness (Kellog-Briand crew) making the likelyhood of interstate warfare less likely tend to be disproven by history.
Jimbo is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation