Go Back   Small Wars Council > Military Art & Science Applied > Doctrine & TTPs

Doctrine & TTPs Enduring doctrinal principles, what really works now (or not), and the TTPs that deliver them.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2013   #1
Bill Moore
Council Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,008
Default How to Lose a War: A Primer

I much appreciate a friend sending the link to this most interesting read on zenpundit's blog. In addition to providing some provocative insights on why we failed in Iraq and Afghanistan (most in my opinion are hard to argue with), it reminds me that I need to start visited this blog again. I used to visit regularly and it is clear Zen still maintains his high standards.

Since Pakistan is now attempting to get its victory over the United States in Afghanistan formally ratified, now seemed to be a good time to reflect on the performance of American statesmen, politicians and senior generals.

It has occurred to me that we have many books and papers outlining how to win wars. Certainly the great classics of The Art of War, The History of the Peloponnesian War and On War are the foremost examples, but there are also other useful classics in the strategic canon, whole libraries of military histories, memoirs of great commanders and an infinite number of PDFs and powerpoint briefs from think tanks and consultants. Strangely, none of these have helped us much. Perhaps it is because before running this war so few of this generation’s “deciders” read them en route to their law degrees and MBAs
A small sample from the post:

Keeping in mind #1, the point of war policy is to generate a set of politically compelling slogans that remain ill-defined enough to serve as an umbrella under which many contradictory and competing agendas can cohabit until some of them can be opportunistically realized. These agendas may not be realistic – in fact, it is easier to put them forward as attractive fantasies for the public if your administration is unburdened with officials with genuine expertise in warfare, economics, foreign cultures, history and other inconvenient information that the media and the political opposition will only be too happy to seize upon. The more abstractly and arcanely expressed the policy the harder it is for critics to demolish and the better it is for losing wars.
Bill Moore is offline  
Old 08-01-2013   #2
Council Member
gute's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 322

My initial reaction to the article is that we (politicians, diplomats, governments, militaries) over think everything and that is why we fail. I'm coming to the conclusion that most of our failures are not due to not thinking things through, but over thinking. But, that's my initial reaction so I need to finish reading it, probably read it again and then comment. So, why comment? Because, that's what I do. It's the Scot in me
gute is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rhodesian COIN (consolidated thread, inc original RLI) SWJED Historians 418 3 Weeks Ago 04:07 PM
Doug Macgregor on "Hybrid War" Gian P Gentile Futurists & Theorists 15 07-10-2010 12:16 PM
The argument to partition Iraq SWJED Iraqi Governance 26 03-10-2008 06:18 PM
A Modest Proposal to Adjust the Principles of War SWJED Futurists & Theorists 126 12-27-2007 02:38 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation