Results 1 to 20 of 708

Thread: The US & others working with Pakistan

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    861

  2. #2
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by omarali50 View Post
    To paraphrase a South African editor from years ago, there is nothing more ridiculous than an American pundit in search of a quick fix to someone else's problems.
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    861

    Default

    This article may clear the "fog of war" a little: http://www.pakistankakhudahafiz.com/...ut-fighting-4/

  4. #4
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Omar:

    I couldn't get through that article after the author described the various muj groups fighting the Soviets as a "brilliant war machine."
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New York State
    Posts
    34

    Default

    For all the stereotypical Pakistani proclamations that Americans are fat, lazy and stupid, I find it quite interesting that that Pakistan still does not realize the game is rigged, due to the vast asymmetry, such that heads USA wins, and tails Pakistan loses. The sooner Pakistan realizes that, the less painful the change in course will be, but change its course it must, at one point or another.

    The rather clever "damned if you do, damned if you don't" (The DIYD^2) policy as I see it:

    Insist on an apology for Salala = Paint your foreign policy into a corner
    Forego an apology for Salala = destroy morale and lose prestige

    Don't do an operation in NWA = harboring terrorists
    Do an operation in NWA = get drawn into a bloody and costly conflict on own territory

    OBL hidden by ISI = partners in 9/11
    OBL not hidden by ISI = incompetent fools

    Dr. Afridi sentenced for treason = prosecuting a hero who help kill OBL with the attendant fallout
    Dr. Afridi let go = live with a growing number of spies and traitors working with impunity on own soil, and loss of domestic prestige

    Close supply routes = change from ally to adversary
    Open supply routes = be seen as being for sale

    And I could go on, but one can get an idea that USA may not be as foolish as Pakistanis would like to think.

  6. #6
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VCheng View Post
    OBL hidden by ISI = partners in 9/11
    OBL not hidden by ISI = incompetent fools
    My guess is that one day someone somewhere within the Pakistani government had an appointment with an American official who informed him that he knew that bin Laden was in Abbottabad and that both of them knew that there was only one non-negotiable in the U.S./Pakistan relationship. There was an agreement that blind eyes would be turned on 01 May 2011 to a raid that could be written off as a drone strike if need be. Big Problem #1: The execution was such that the drone strike narrative became untenable and Much Bigger Problem #2: The POTUS made a media event out of the killing without consulting anyone in Pakistan beforehand. Now, I doubt any of us will ever know the real story, but if the above were to be true how would that color the actions of the Pakistani government over the course of the past year?

    Quote Originally Posted by VCheng View Post
    For all the stereotypical Pakistani proclamations that Americans are fat, lazy and stupid, I find it quite interesting that that Pakistan still does not realize the game is rigged, due to the vast asymmetry, such that heads USA wins, and tails Pakistan loses. The sooner Pakistan realizes that, the less painful the change in course will be, but change its course it must, at one point or another.
    So your advice is for the Pakistani government to be the State Department’s bitch?
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  7. #7
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Ganulv:

    That is a very good guess. The only part I think different is that it was never meant to be a drone strike. It was meant to be what it turned out to be from the beginning and the Pak Army/ISI knew it.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 39
    Last Post: 03-21-2014, 01:56 PM
  2. NATO's Afghanistan Challenge
    By Ray in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 05-13-2011, 04:11 AM
  3. Step 1: Decentralize Afghanistan
    By IntelTrooper in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 12:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •