Results 1 to 20 of 48

Thread: Enhanced MAGTF Operations- USMC's Small Unit Future

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Thanks for that update.

    Though this item caused me to have all kinda psychopathic conflicts.
    ...removing the Plt Guides, & adding a Scout & Reconnaissance Section...
    Being a Platoon Guide (briefly) was the most august rank I managed in the Corps.

    Howsomeever, the Sct Section in the Co is great!!!

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Though this item caused me to have all kinda psychopathic conflicts. Being a Platoon Guide (briefly) was the most august rank I managed in the Corps.

    Howsomeever, the Sct Section in the Co is great!!!
    You might be terribly grieved by reason they said they removed it then. They said that... It appeared useless & seemed to serve no purpose.

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default That became true after about the US Mexican War in one sense.

    Quote Originally Posted by COMMAR View Post
    You might be terribly grieved by reason they said they removed it then. They said that... It appeared useless & seemed to serve no purpose.
    Once going on line to fight became not in fashion he really had no job as a 'guide.' Plus that's been said before -- there were none before Korea, they got quickly added back in during that fracas, so no grieving from me (other than a head shake at business as usual ).

    However, they missed the fact that most everyone knew that and kept the space around for most of another 160 plus years as an Assistant Platoon Sergeant for four reasons:

    - Marine aggressiveness meant high casualty ratios and the rapid availability of an experienced NCO as a replacement in the heavy combat of WW II, Korea and even Viet Nam was important. (Today, right now anyway, with far fewer casualties, that seems less important to the folks who have not experienced 50% or more casualties in one operation and have been told to find spaces...).

    - He could do the beans and bullets while the Platoon Sergeant did the more important tactical stuff and sheparded his LT. Or, if the Platoon Sergeant wasn't that competent tactically (it happens), the Guide hopefully would be...

    - He was an immediate replacement (due to the above mentioned combat job and thus location) for a knocked out Platoon Sergeant -- or even a Squad Leader if that seemed worthwhile. Or for a Platoon Sergeant position in another Platoon that had taken even higher casualties. He had disappeared before in various reorganizations but just wouldn't stay dead...

    - He was a counterpoint to the Platoon Sergeant and was being very effectively trained for that job while offering a different approach to the constant training of the Squad and FT Leaders.

    Other than that, 'they' were right, It appeared useless...

Similar Threads

  1. Intro to the Tactics and Technique of Small Wars
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-30-2006, 12:35 AM
  2. Disarming the Local Population
    By CSC2005 in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 01:10 PM
  3. Book Review: Airpower in Small Wars
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2006, 06:14 PM
  4. Dealing With Uncertainty: The Future Requires Flexibility
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-29-2005, 12:28 AM
  5. Training for Small Wars
    By SWJED in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2005, 06:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •