SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Adversary / Threat

Adversary / Threat One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Talk about (or with?) them.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2014   #1
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,830
Default

Thanks to Twitter two useful academic references to US-UK research, one is online and the other only an abstract. The theme is Mental Illness and Lone-Actor Terrorism, although far more is covered.

Article:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...029.12312/full

Abstract:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133916

What is of note is that a third of:
Quote:
Lone-actor terrorists regularly engaged in a detectable and observable range of activities with a wider pressure group, social movement, or terrorist organization.
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 08-11-2016 at 08:26 PM. Reason: An old post found in the Canada LE thread and copied here.
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016   #2
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,830
Default Mental health and political violence

Mental health as a cause of terrorism and violence has appeared before on the Forum, but appears to be increasingly important after recent attacks in Europe and the USA.

Many issues, not just prediction and response, are involved and these two articles help.

Within the first article. Some may alight on Brian Jenkins thought: 'stray dogs' not 'lone wolves':
Quote:
...looking for a cause that will give them meaning and make sense of their mental turmoil. Crucially, an extremist ideology offers them the possibility of transforming their identity: to re-imagine themselves not as failures, but as warriors, whose prior difficulties are not personal shortcomings, but evidence of the cultural decadence that they now disavow.
Link:https://www.opendemocracy.net/benjamin-ramm/we-need-to-rethink-relationship-between-mental-health-and-political-violence?

The second is an article from The Guardian, with a sub-title:
Quote:
It is possible to be both a terrorist and mentally unstable

(A sample passage) As with any kind of sectarian indoctrination, religion can become a kind of healing or means of achieving redemption after a dissolute past, which corresponds perfectly with the apocalyptic vision of Isis. Many conversions to jihadism are preceded by a trail of violence and humiliation.
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...s-attacks-nice

Incidentally IIRC the Forum has looked at US mass killings, notably at schools, but those posts appear to be a wider US terrorism / lone wolves thread. Mental Health appears in too many threads. Maybe the thread on Congresswoman Gifford's shooting will help:http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=12229
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 07-29-2016 at 10:17 AM.
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2016   #3
SWJ Blog
Council Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 10,115
Default Mental health and political violence

Mental Illness and Terrorism

Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJournal.

Last edited by davidbfpo; 08-10-2016 at 05:16 PM. Reason: Copied and edited. 719v
SWJ Blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016   #4
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,830
Default Little agreement here

Three articles on the subject today in my email box.

Following the murder of a US tourist in central London last week a curious story in The Guardian:
Quote:
One way or another, the attacks in Russell Square represent a gap in Britain’s system of public safety – be it in national security, or in how Britain’s under-resourced and severely strained mental health system looks after those who need it most.

(Then almost following a police script) About half of all people feared to be at risk of terrorist sympathies may have mental health or psychological problems, a police study has found. The police study of 500 cases dealt with by Channel, an anti-radicalisation scheme, found that 44% of the individuals involved were assessed as being likely to have vulnerabilities related to mental health or psychological difficulties. A further 15% were assessed as possibly having vulnerabilities but more assessment was needed. In May, Chief Constable Simon Cole, who is in charge of the Prevent programme, which aims to protect people against radicalisation, told the Guardian: “There would appear to be, from the work we have been doing, a link to people who are vulnerable around mental health.”
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...n-knife-attack


I am puzzled at the reference to a study of Channel, as so far no external review, let alone by academics, has been allowed of the project's work. There are anecdotes that the mentally ill are referred as the CT budget is seen to have more money.


A British academic neuroscientist has written a commentary and two key passages reflecting the debate here are:
Quote:
Caution must be taken when interpreting the link between extremist violence and mental health. Mental health problems are relatively common (1 in 4 people will experience a mental health problem each year) whereas violent extremism is extremely rare.
Whilst there is an increased risk of violence in severe mental health conditions, the vast majority of people struggling with a severe mental illness are non-violent. Similarly, many violent extremists will not have mental health problems. If not handled carefully, the implications of linking extremist violence to mental illness may perpetuate the stigma surrounding mental illness and consequently discourage people with mental health needs to seek help.
Link:https://www.opendemocracy.net/jessica-j-steventon/radical-thinking-can-violent-extremism-be-prevented-by-addressing-mental-health?

The third short piece / letter is by a Belfast-based Consultant Psychiatrist, who takes a contrary stance:
Quote:
Politicians, the media and others all too often respond to terrorism by lazily and superficially claiming it to be ‘psychotic’, ‘crazy’, ‘insane’, ‘psychopathic’ or (most mindlessly of all) ‘mindless’. Islamic State are disgustingly murderous, but Abu Bakr al Bhagdadi and his activists are not driven by mental illness. It is very worrisome if psychiatrists contribute to this unscientific discourse.
Link:http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/terror...0%99s-politics
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 08-11-2016 at 10:38 AM. Reason: 800v
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017   #5
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 10,830
Default Mental health & terrorism: no clear conclusion

An article in CTC's Sentinel and the Abstract states:
Quote:
The wave of Islamic State-linked terrorism experienced in the West over the past couple of years has rekindled debates surrounding mental disorders and terrorist engagement. A very preliminary survey by the authors found that out of 55 attacks in the West where the 76 individuals involved were possibly influenced by the Islamic State, according to media reports, 27.6% had a history of apparent psychological instability, a percentage comparable to that found in the general population. This figure is driven largely by individuals inspired by the Islamic State, as opposed to those directed by it, however. The percentage is likely overinflated for several noteworthy reasons, including poor reporting, low benchmarks, and the tendency to overuse mental health problems as a ‘silver-bullet’ explanation for terrorist involvement. The relationship is, in fact, far more complex than typically presented.
Their conclusion starts with:
Quote:
It is simply too early to come to a definitive answer regarding the role of mental health problems and various forms of Islamic State terrorism. Mental disorders appear more prevalent among those inspired by Islamic State than those directed by it. Beyond that, however, it is difficult to make clear conclusions.
Link:https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/is-th...-islamic-state
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 01-31-2017 at 09:45 PM. Reason: 5,130v 4k up in three months
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017   #6
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 2,020
Default

Considering ISIS is an army of psychopaths, this thread should be cross-hyperlinked with the other one.

OK then:http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=22994
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

Last edited by davidbfpo; 02-04-2017 at 05:41 PM. Reason: Add link as requested.
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
counterterrorism, intelligence, mass killings, mental health, terrorism, violence

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
North Korea: merged catch all thread SWJED Asia-Pacific 550 12-02-2016 08:42 PM
The David Kilcullen Collection (merged thread) Fabius Maximus Doctrine & TTPs 451 03-31-2016 03:23 PM
The Pandemic Threat AdamG Global Issues & Threats 10 07-31-2014 05:29 PM
“’Dishonest Doctrine:’ Or, How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love Coin Doctrine” Gian P Gentile Doctrine & TTPs 136 06-17-2008 01:28 PM
Military Retirees May Face Big Bump in Health Costs Jedburgh The Whole News 3 12-24-2007 06:56 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9. ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation