Results 1 to 20 of 59

Thread: DO is dead, hail Enhanced Company Operations!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jacksonville, NC
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Do not read into this article. My take is the focus will be for Companies to start taking over many of the functions usually reserved for battalions. In my experience in Iraq company FOBs operated semi-independently from Battalion HQ. They relied upon the battalion for logistical support but had all the requirements in place to handle operations. Even to the point of conducting limited targeting.

    The effort to place intel cells at the company level just reinforces this effort. Put the tools to accomplish the mission at the lowest level.

    Just my two cents.

  2. #2
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crusoe View Post
    Do not read into this article. My take is the focus will be for Companies to start taking over many of the functions usually reserved for battalions. In my experience in Iraq company FOBs operated semi-independently from Battalion HQ. They relied upon the battalion for logistical support but had all the requirements in place to handle operations. Even to the point of conducting limited targeting.

    The effort to place intel cells at the company level just reinforces this effort. Put the tools to accomplish the mission at the lowest level.

    Just my two cents.
    That's a valid approach as long as resources are not seriously limited. It's likely effective but not very efficient, though.

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Combat effectiveness

    trumps efficiency. Totally. Unless one can safely remain a theorist...

  4. #4
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    trumps efficiency. Totally. Unless one can safely remain a theorist...
    It seems as you (as American?) didn't quite get the "resources" thing in my post.

  5. #5
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default I got it...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    It seems as you (as American?) didn't quite get the "resources" thing in my post.
    I just ignored it...

    Priorities are priorities. Effectiveness is the priority, efficiency will ALWAYS be second...

    Other than in theory, of course.

  6. #6
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    And so the KingTiger was born...

  7. #7
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Proving that effectiveness in the secondary

    mission of defense versus little or none in the primary mission of offensive maneuver isn't truly effective?

    Got to admire the efficiency of production in spite of obstacles though.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •