Results 1 to 20 of 77

Thread: The Andrew Bacevich collection

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jugurtha View Post
    I've come to the conclusion that people, in general, aren't interested in coming to a joint conclusion during an argument, but forcing their idea on you and refusing to grant anything you say.
    But what if the idea or opinion is correct? I'm not purposely going off topic, I'm just going to use this as an an example to make my point:
    How's the economy doing?

    Now if you ask that to your average, blue collar, Joe Q public guy, who get's his "news" from Katie Couric and the local newspaper only (because he doesn't have the time or interest), most will say it sucks. All the while his 401k is skyrocketing, he's paying less taxes, and he's been steadily working full time and, in many cases, OT for the past 6 years.
    I'm sorry, perhaps I was incorrect placing all the blame on the media in my previous comment, but they are still guilty for a LOT of the problems when it comes to public support. In the case of economics, the Bush administration did come out and counter the misinformation...many times. But guess what happened? The media ignored or buried it.

    The MSM hardly ever reports on how many schools are being built by our Soldiers and the locals in Iraq or Afghanistan, but I can almost guarantee it will be on the front page or be the lead story when one gets blown up. I don't see how anyone can blame the administration for that.
    Last edited by skiguy; 06-07-2007 at 09:50 PM. Reason: punctuation

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skiguy View Post
    But what if the idea or opinion is correct? I'm not purposely going off topic, I'm just going to use this as an an example to make my point:
    How's the economy doing?
    In a rational discussion/argument between two people that are cooperating with each other (trying to come to the "right" answer) then they will end up at the correct opinion/idea, regardless of whose it is or if it directly opposed one's original viewpoint. My point is that most discussions/arguments are not of this nature. There is a lot more give and take in the discussions/arguments as stated above that doesn't happen today. Watch any "Crossfire" type show and you'll see what I mean. These are debates that are trying to achieve nothing but entertainment. This closed and non-cooperative argument/discussion is more hurtful to our efforts than anti-war protests.

Similar Threads

  1. MCG 1997 Small Unit Tactics Collection
    By Granite_State in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2013, 06:50 PM
  2. "Processing Intelligence Collection: Learning or Not?"
    By Tracker275 in forum Intelligence
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 12:46 AM
  3. Relationship between the political system and causes of war (questions)
    By AmericanPride in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 03-30-2008, 09:16 PM
  4. LE Resources
    By sgmgrumpy in forum Law Enforcement
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-22-2007, 12:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •