-
Council Member
Three thoughts & comments
My first reaction - on a wider European level - is that participation in such activities when a part of a coalition with the USA will have an impact of each defence forces learning / experience / equipment / tactics. Kilcullen cites the Danes as being amongst the best COIN operators in Afghanistan and another here (Ken?) cites the Swedes have the best kit.
Secondly, especially for peacekeeping / stability ops and those under UN command, is the impact on imagery and legitimacy. Scandanavian participation in UN peacekeeping was (still?) a major focus and commitment. Can COIN experiences be left behind, should they be left behind.
Third, UN operations often cite the professionalism of some NATO / Western nations, alongside a willingness to be 'robust' and make comparisons to others weaknesses. Will involvement in US-led COIN ops and the risk of casualities impact being 'robust'?
Finally I am mindful of the frequent comment that the Europeans in NATO / EU have two million in service and can deploy a tiny fraction. Let alone helicopters and specialist troops.
Just a few thoughts from an armchair.
davidbfpo
Last edited by davidbfpo; 07-01-2009 at 12:07 PM.
Reason: Last sentence added'
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks