Results 1 to 20 of 148

Thread: The Best Trained, Most Professional Military...Just Lost Two Wars?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    155

    Default @ Ken White and Carl

    Ken,

    I respectfully disagree on your point about the American Army and Pakistan.

    Historically, the American Army and NATO are huge boosters of the Pakistani Army for a variety of reasons, some good, some bad:

    1. As a bulwark against communism during the Cold War.
    2. As a potentially useful partner in joint military operations (Mid East and within UN operations).
    3. As a potential strategic prize to be kept out of the reach of China and Russia.
    4. As a potentially useful ally against Russia and/or Iran.
    5. As a potentially useful ally against India or as a conduit for policy toward the 'stans and Central Asia.
    6. Large British Pakistani population as a lobby within NATO and the Anglo-American alliance.
    7. Perhaps even a Saudi lobby within the web of American alliances, etc.


    Traditionally, the Pentagon has been a huge booster and hungered for mil-mil ties and believes in American training of foreign military officers in an almost religious manner. This is likely changed currently, and State is probably the biggest booster. CIA and State and other DC agencies receive huge budgets for administering Pakistan aid programs, military and civilian. This is a DC lobby. There is no other phrase for it.

    Retired American military, contractors, and intelligence personnel represent an important lobby for contacts and business with various members of the elite.

    In short, "water carriers" in the worst instances....

    Ken, I'm sorry, but you must know better. Behind the scenes there are factions that insist we must work with parts of the Pakistani Army and Intelligence services while others suggested this wouldn't work. Those that argued the first had egg on their faces after Abbottabad and there is a lot of CYA going on.


    1. I will add some "references" when I have time, but for now, you all can search for Tommy Franks and Musharraf, among other American Generals who are reported to have close working ties from the past.
    2. Colin Powell had a meeting which is detailed at GWU site (oh, the name escapes me, the one that posts declassified material) with a Pakistani Minister in Aug 2011 and there was much talk about reviving MeTT training, etc.
    3. We tried to work with Nawaz Shariff and then Musharraf prior to 9-11 in order to nab bin Laden. ISI agents were found when Clinton lobbed missiles at training camps in Afghanistan. We've known, always known, but tried to have our cake and eat it too. We would have the old working relationships back and use our contacts to go after Al Q internally. And then mission creep....but this is on everyone involved, everyone. Simply everyone.
    Last edited by Madhu; 10-30-2012 at 10:54 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Connections 2010-2018 Wargaming Conferences
    By BayonetBrant in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-21-2018, 10:44 AM
  2. Lost posts on Small Wars Council o/a Jan 8, 2011
    By SWCAdmin in forum Small Wars Council / Journal
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-10-2011, 02:41 AM
  3. Specially Protected Persons in Combat Situations (new title)
    By Tukhachevskii in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: 10-11-2010, 07:26 PM
  4. Book Review: Airpower in Small Wars
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2006, 06:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •