Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: Can Military Governments be a good thing (for a while)?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member TheCurmudgeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    1,117

    Default What does the original small wars journal say?

    I don't have a copy and would love to know.

    As far as I can see, military coup is just another option for a bloodless transition. It depends on the motivation of the military. I don't think it needs to be automatically and arbitrarily attacked.

    I like the model the Egyptian's have take so far. The choice of the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court was a nice choice.

    For a long time the Turkish military guaranteed secular government that Ataturk tried to establish. That kind of dedication to an ideal can act as a stabilizing factor or it can be used to gain personal political power.
    "I can change almost anything ... but I can't change human nature."

    Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan
    ---

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Questions and Links

    The OP title, Can Military Governments be a good thing (for a while)?, immediately brought to mind two questions:

    1. "Good thing" for whom ?

    2. "Good thing" for what ?

    Each has, I expect, a dozen or more answers; as well as a similar plethora of answers for the counterpoint questions:

    1. "Bad thing" for whom ?

    2. "Bad thing" for what ?

    --------------------------
    Links to USMC Small Wars Manual (Wiki, Manual and NWC Book Review). The most important concept is the end goal, chap. 15, "Withdrawal".

    I expect a spirited discussion would evolve from consideration of whether the USMC interventions in Cuba, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua were "good things" or "bad things".

    Regards

    Mike

  3. #3
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCurmudgeon View Post
    I don't have a copy and would love to know.

    As far as I can see, military coup is just another option for a bloodless transition. It depends on the motivation of the military. I don't think it needs to be automatically and arbitrarily attacked.
    I define good as being better than a decent into internal Civil War. The Army appears to be trying to preserve the primarry purpose of Government which is to Protect and Provide the

    jmm99 has provided several references for the manual. Chapter 13 on Military Government appears to be what the Egyptian Army is in so far as they are being selective as to who and what is replaced until elections can be established.

Similar Threads

  1. Vietnam collection (lessons plus)
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 140
    Last Post: 06-27-2014, 04:40 AM
  2. SWJ Small Wars Survey 2012
    By MikeF in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 01-19-2012, 11:57 PM
  3. More killing. Less good deeds
    By William F. Owen in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 04:32 AM
  4. Military Affairs Course Syllabus
    By Jesse9252 in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 08:54 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •