|
|
#1 | ||||
|
Council Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 137
|
http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/...japan-1.137999 Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ". . .the voluntary evacuation was precautionary and that he knew of no elevated radiation measurements at U.S. bases that prompted it." Voluntary means self-inflicted. A NEO of choice and not of necessity. What are we strategically communicating to Host Nation when we abandon ship like this? Seems to me that all U.S. military personnel sponsoring dependents in Japan are affected. Every last one of them now has to explain their personal decision to their spouse rather than just kiss 'em good-bye and tell 'em to quit crying and get on the G. D. bus. And not knowing what the demand is going to be ensures a Charlie Foxtrot at the departure airfields. Oprah is on AFN Japan. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 98
|
I think it's probably a wise precaution. Unlike the hysteria surrounding potential CONUS fallout, there is some sense to this. The Japanese 12 mile evacuation zone is too damned small, and both the power company and their government are not performing very well dealing with these problems. Having dealt directly with the Japanese government, this does not surprise me any. Weaseling, misdirection, and lying are pretty much their normal way of doing business. This can be seen both in the track record of the power company, and the constant state of near failure their government operates under. Those are their results, not my opinions. They're likely to keep having a lot of meetings, and keep doing too little.
The odds that there will be a meltdown of sufficient temperatures that the resultant gases reach superheated temperatures are extremely low, to the point of not being a very credible scenario. That is what it would take to generate dry particulate matter in the upper reaches of the atmosphere that could in turn potentially generate trans-oceanic fallout. Those sorts of temperatures are usually only achieved via a nuclear detonation. Radioactive particulate matter escaping right now, and potentially in the future is doing so carried in steam. It's already wet, it's not dry matter, and it's heavy matter too. These are complex heavy molecules that are already wet, and are more than less likely to attract further condensation. Which means that it's very unlikely that they're going to dry out, magically float higher, and cause the easily paniced masses on the US west coast any trouble. It does however mean that there's some serious potential for toxic ground fog to develop, and localized toxic rainfall. I say localized because even caught up in a rain storm, these are the first things that get rained out, not the last. Rain storms are cyclical, think about those thunderstorm models every weather report you've ever seen trot out during the summer. Storms are constantly replentishing themselves, until they lose sources of moisture, lose energy, lose material that acts to facilitate condensation, and stop. In this case, the steam acts as a comparatively low level (compared to the `we just poured out a cup of the Sun' levels of heat) gas in the atmosphere, and the particulate matter acts to seed condensation. This is material that wants to sink. Since it's primarily in steam, or in steamy smoke, it loses it's thermal energy very quickly. So the threat is localized, it will stay local, and none of the surrounding countries are at any great risk at this point. Some of the modeling that's out there in the press right now is based off of figures & data related to nuclear detonations, not comparatively cold and wet smoldering fires. These are obviously flawed models, but it's an easy communications based mistake to make when someone is asking you what would happen if the radioactive material did get that high, and not how would it get there, or if it was even possible. However, people in Japan are, and if we're going to help, it makes a heck of a lot of sense to free servicemembers up to only have to worry about themselves, their own safety, and their mission. If I had family within 300 miles of those plants, I would evacuate them. All of what I've said is my own opinion, and I'd certainly welcome any data based contradictions to it. I want to see these problems solved, and I don't want to contribute to the witless fear mongering that's pervading the press. I might remind SmallWars readers that you all are all too familiar with just how much the press is full of crap. This instance is no different than the litany of profit driven narrative lying that you've already become quite sadly used to seeing. Last edited by anonamatic; 03-18-2011 at 04:52 AM. Reason: sentence completion |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southport NC
Posts: 41
|
Keep in mind, there are power issues as well as major logistics issues that Japan faces right now. The less population in affected areas, the better. Less to take care of. It is high time we restart NEO ops seeing what is happening to so many countries. Get them home and safe so the JOE's can do their work light hearted, not worrying about loved ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 309
|
Quote:
__________________
PH Cannady Correlate Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 309
|
Among other things, a national struggle with long division.
__________________
PH Cannady Correlate Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Council Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 137
|
http://www.stripes.com/first-militar...and+Stripes%29
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 309
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
PH Cannady Correlate Systems Last edited by Presley Cannady; 03-19-2011 at 05:32 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,218
|
I know this matter slipped from view, but an IISS Strategic Comment is worth a read, partly as it identifies an issue which officialdom would rather keep from public view - nuclear security as illustrated by:
Quote:
I noted that at the 2011 summit the UK became the 'lead' for one of the nine areas for work 'Protecting sensitive information related to nuclear security (United Kingdom)'. Given the history of HMG over the UK's own nuclear history an excellent choice, as one insider recently commented akin to "There are many decisions made where there are no official records".
__________________
davidbfpo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fort Lee, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 31
|
1) Those interested in recently (?) measured radiation levels (at different distances from the Fukushima reactors in Japan) should see:
#http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuc...nitor02_01.pdf # (dose levels measured 1 meter above the ground) #http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuc...nitor02_02.pdf (dose levels measured 1 centimeter above the ground) Note that the color code is explained near the lower left corner of each display. Radiation levels are expressed in micro-Sieverts per hour. [The 10 micro-sieverts, for example, is the same as 0.01 mSv, etc. And 10 micro-Sievert/hour is the same as 0.24 mSv/day, or 7.2 mSv/month.] 2) How significant are these levels? The effect of penetrating radiation on a person depends on the dose received. The common unit of dose is Sievert (Sv). Smaller doses are expressed in milliseverts (mSv) or microseveret. A dose of 10 Sv will most likely results in death, within a day or two. 5 Sv would kill about 50% of exposed people. 2 Sv can also be fatal, especially without prompt treatment. 0.25 Sv = 250 mSv is the limit for emergency workers in life-saving operations. 0.10 Sv = 100 mSv dose is clearly linked to later cancer risks. 0.05 Sv = 50 mSv is the yearly limit for radiation workers. 0.004 Sv= 4 mSv typical yearly dose due to natural radiation (cosmic rays, etc). 0.003 Sv= 3 mSV typical dose from mammogram Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia) .
__________________
Ludwik Kowalski, author of a free ON-LINE book entitled “Diary of a Former Communist: Thoughts, Feelings, Reality.” http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html It is a testimony based on a diary kept between 1946 and 2004 (in the USSR, Poland, France and the USA). The more people know about proletarian dictatorship the less likely will we experience is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
|
Just joined up and the information in your post is just what I've been looking for. Many Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fort Lee, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 31
|
Radiation:Fukushima reactors update The accident phase was enden in Fukushima, as described at: http://tinyurl.com/8yshwhy But the process of “decommisioning reactors” is expected to take 40 years. Ludwik Kowalski .
__________________
Ludwik Kowalski, author of a free ON-LINE book entitled “Diary of a Former Communist: Thoughts, Feelings, Reality.” http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html It is a testimony based on a diary kept between 1946 and 2004 (in the USSR, Poland, France and the USA). The more people know about proletarian dictatorship the less likely will we experience is. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| fukishima, japan, radiarion, reactors |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coupla Questions From a Newbie | kwillcox | RFIs & Members' Projects | 4 | 02-09-2007 06:32 AM |
| KN Nuclear Test News Roundup | SWJED | The Whole News | 4 | 11-05-2006 12:59 AM |