SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > The Small Wars Community of Interest > Blog Watch

Blog Watch Seen something good on a blog lately? Let the rest of us know about it, and share your thoughts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2006   #1
Merv Benson
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, Texas
Posts: 305
Default Mogudishu a bad analogy

From PrairiePundit:

Quote:
Rahm Emanuel has an opinion piece in the LA Times saying that Bush is responsible for not sending eneough troops to Iraq. He is off target on several counts.

Quote:
ON OCT. 3, 1993, an American helicopter was shot down in Somalia. Efforts to rescue the downed pilots went terribly wrong, and 18 Americans were killed. It was a humiliating incident for the world's most powerful nation. It also devastated 18 American families. When President Clinton was told that his commanders on the ground had requested more troops but had been ignored by Secretary of Defense Les Aspin, Clinton acted decisively and fired him.

...

This president had the responsibility to direct the war but deferred to Rumsfeld. Congress had a constitutional responsibility to oversee the president's actions. Instead, it has spent the last three years on the sidelines, approving every funding request — nearly half a trillion dollars — no questions asked. The glaring mistakes made at every stage of the war were ignored in favor of feel-good speeches about staying the course. The retired generals are taking the unusual step of speaking up because for the last three years the Republican Congress has been silent.

...
What Emanual omits is not one of the eight generals he sites were commanders of the operations in Iraq. Both Bush and Rumsfeld followed the military advice of of the Centcom commanders, either Tommy Franks or John Abizaid in deciding the number of troops needed in Iraq. That is far different from the situation in Mogudishu where the advice of the commander was ignored. What is also different is that Clinton did not stick it out in Mogudishu and bin Laden read that as a lack of will that led him to believe he could do the 9-11 attacks. Clinton's lack of will to win led directly to 9-11, something Emanual would rather not talk about.

While a case can be made that more troops would have shortened the war in Iraq, the reasons for not doing it were based on a decision by the responsible commanders who were backed by Bush and Rumsfeld, both of whom said that if the military asks for more troops they will get them. Since the troop levels went up and down over the course of the war based on request from Centcom, there is every reason to believe what they said. The eight generals and some civilians disagree with the military judgment of Centcom commanders. They and Enamueal should not delegate that responsibility upward in order to make a political point.
Merv Benson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006   #2
DDilegge
Council Member
 
DDilegge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 133
Default Read Cobra II

You might have a point about the ‘Black Hawk Down’ analogy - still - Cobra II makes a good point for front-ending more troops in 2003. Read it - it puts Frank's book American Soldier into a whole other light.
DDilegge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006   #3
Merv Benson
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, Texas
Posts: 305
Default The Prolog to the war in Iraq

I am in the process of reading Cobra II, but so far have found nothing that refutes the transcript of the President talking with the component commanders that is presented in Tommy Franks American Soldier.

Quote:
Before the order was given to commence combat operations in Iraq the President asked Franks and each of the component commanders individually the same questions.

Quote:
...

... "General," he asked Buss Mosely, "do you have everything you need to win?"

"You bet Sir."

"Pleased with the strategy?" the President continued.

"Absolutely," Buzz answered.

...
Later the President said:

Quote:
... "I am going to stop asking about the plan since you guys were the ones that developed it."

I heard laughter around the teleconference loop. The President had the natural leader's ability to put his subordinates at ease.


And , so it went around the room as each was asked the same questions and each responded as Mosely did. It should be noted that none of the people around that table have joined the intimidated generals club. In fact, Gen. Franks and Rifle DeLong have spoken out forcefully against the notion put forward by the members of that club. But the myth of interference with the plan will die as hard as the Shinseki myth. Some do not want to let facts get in the way of their feelings.

Emanual is just dead wrong.
The quotes are excerpts from this post which contains much more on the generals.
Merv Benson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation