Results 1 to 20 of 227

Thread: Re-structuring the BCT

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member TAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    115

    Default R&s

    True reconnaissance is merely finding and observing the enemy.
    A bit of semantics here too, I think.

    Some folks use the terms two reconnaissance and surveillance inter-changably. I do not.

    A basic functional distinction often proposed is that surveillance tends to be more passive, the watch and listen mode, while reconnaissance tends to be more active,

    A time and a place for both types of gathering intel.

    My real basic issue with the BCT Recon Sqdrns was that they are out of step with current tactical reality and lack the ability for "Fight for Information" that now appears the more likely need, at least in Major Combat Operations.

    COIN/Stability Ops is a whole other ballgame.

    An intersesting note to me is that a USMC Division has both a Recon Bn (with the sneak and peek types) and a LAV Bn for "Classic" CAV missions.

    TAH
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-30-2010 at 08:56 PM. Reason: Fix quote

Similar Threads

  1. Wargaming Small Wars (merged thread)
    By Steve Blair in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 317
    Last Post: 02-21-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. mTBI, PTSD and Stress (Catch All)
    By GorTex6 in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 177
    Last Post: 04-20-2016, 07:00 PM
  3. The BCT CDR's Role Security Force Assistance
    By Rob Thornton in forum Equipment & Capabilities
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 12:09 AM
  4. The Army's TMAAG
    By SWJED in forum FID & Working With Indigenous Forces
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-27-2008, 01:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •