Results 1 to 20 of 87

Thread: 'The General Mattis collection: a mixture

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Guderian crossed the Meuse at Sedan using the normal German leadership methods.
    He had trained the troops very well for that particular action before the campaign, though.

  2. #2
    Council Member Umar Al-Mokhtār's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cirenaica
    Posts
    374

    Default Of mice and men

    It is as much about the commander clearly explaining his intent and plan as it is for the subordinate to carry it out with minimal further direction. But as it is said even the best plan rarely survives contact.

    I agree that “turning off the radios” is a bit much plus our over reliance on technology is not so much radios as it is those things that replace solid field craft, like GPS. While GPS is a great thing the art of map reading and navigation using the compass are falling by the wayside. That is an over-reliance on technology. Comms are comms and short of wig wag and heliograph there's not much else you can do to replicate them.
    "What is best in life?" "To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women."

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Contrary to popular opinion, there were radios when I started

    wearing a war suit...

    I really do post date the Smoke Signals and even the Telegraph and Heliograph.

    ...Barely...

    However, I'm old enough that radio was the primary comm means and we did back then turn 'em off for training and for real when our emissions might have been a problem.

    There was no replicate to it, the idea was not to find alternatives or substitutes, it was to do the job without using them at all. Hard as it is to believe with all the modern gee whiz stuff, GPS, BFT, etc. (those are just aids -- and that's all they are, aids, they are not imperatives) and amazing as it may seem that units were trusted to the extent that they were released from view and 'positive control' to perform actual combat missions in a fairly active war or two, it was done. You can really do that...

    One would be remiss to not understand that even if non use of comm and the other aids was not intentional it did, does and can happen due to both technological and logistic problems -- and even more frequently as a result enemy or combat action. Combat is hard on equipment...

    The problem is that we are not using our aids as aids-- they are too often being used as substitutes for a lack of training. They have ceased being a cane and have become a Walker (or even a Wheelchair in some cases...) That's what Mattis is warning against...

Similar Threads

  1. Pakistani Army commentary
    By wm in forum South Asia
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 06-10-2018, 09:26 AM
  2. General Petraeus: collection
    By SWJED in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 280
    Last Post: 10-05-2016, 04:15 PM
  3. Brigadier General Selections for 2008
    By Cavguy in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-22-2008, 05:15 PM
  4. Afghan General Wants Special Forces To Fight Terrorists
    By SWJED in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2006, 10:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •