Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 87

Thread: 'The General Mattis collection: a mixture

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    He makes some good points about over reliance on technology.

    Mattis: Military should rely less on technology
    OK but.....

    I like General Mattis. He's on my tick list, but I'm not sure about this. "Turn the radios off" is a tad simplistic, and so-called "mission command" is not enabled just by switching off radios. - also there are very many differing types of "mission command."

    Sure, use the radios less. Practice pro-longed radio silence, but that did not mean switching them off - and as the entire command system of the US Army is essentially digital, I'm more than curious to know how this gets put into practice.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  2. #2
    Council Member Chris jM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    176

    Default

    There were a number of interesting replies when this was posted on the SWJ blog here: http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/201...hould-rely-le/

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    "Turn the radios off" is a tad simplistic, and so-called "mission command" is not enabled just by switching off radios. - also there are very many differing types of "mission command."
    But simple works! I don't think that Gen Mattis expects a radio switch to go to 'off' and de-centralised mission command to suddenly be turned on. However, taking away some of the props that support micro-management and enable massive reach-down can be a great thing in training. If people are suddenly forced to employ verbal orders, use their own initiative in-keeping with their commander's intent and trust their subordinates once in a while it can only be of benefit, even when technology is allowed again.
    '...the gods of war are capricious, and boldness often brings better results than reason would predict.'
    Donald Kagan

  3. #3
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris jM View Post
    There were a number of interesting replies when this was posted on the SWJ blog here: http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/201...hould-rely-le/
    WHY Oh WHY... cannot we have the Blog discussion here!! No wonder this board goes a bit quiet. Why is the blog comment different form the Forum!! We are missing a trick!! IMO - possible IMHO.... but unlikely....

    But simple works! I don't think that Gen Mattis expects a radio switch to go to 'off' and de-centralised mission command to suddenly be turned on.
    Wallah!! Mate, I am as simple as it gets. I am the Mr Simple of simple things. It's my schtick. Clausewitz the Hedgehog!!! I may well be an opinoated arrogant little twat, but I am very simple opinionated.... you get it!
    If people are suddenly forced to employ verbal orders, use their own initiative in-keeping with their commander's intent and trust their subordinates once in a while it can only be of benefit, even when technology is allowed again.
    Yes, its about leaders leading regardless. Ensuring leaders lead, under all likely conditions is leadership. Back in the day I've seen Section Commanders making sketch maps, because there were not enough maps. If I was king, I would be teaching platoons to use whistles. PRR is gradually eroding hand signals. All good. - IF that was what Matis is talking about, then all for it.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  4. #4
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    OK but.....

    I like General Mattis. He's on my tick list, but I'm not sure about this. "Turn the radios off" is a tad simplistic, and so-called "mission command" is not enabled just by switching off radios. - also there are very many differing types of "mission command."

    Sure, use the radios less. Practice pro-longed radio silence, but that did not mean switching them off - and as the entire command system of the US Army is essentially digital, I'm more than curious to know how this gets put into practice.
    Maybe Mattis wants to make the entire chain think...to teach superiors to occasionally trust their subordinates, or at least allow them to learn on their own. So yes, Wilf, sometimes it DOES mean switching them off. As Chris points out, it's good for learning and testing.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  5. #5
    Council Member Hacksaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lansing, KS
    Posts
    361

    Default Ref: Turning off radios

    I don't know if it was good leadership... but I turned off the BN CMD net in the field more often than I should admit... Not sure I need to call in hourly slant reports when I'm supposed to be in the middle of Battery TNG

    Only got caught once, and when the BN CDR came and found me observing some outstanding PLT TNG lanes designed, organized and led by my junior leaders... I was forgiven my sin... maybe that's why he made 3-star
    Hacksaw
    Say hello to my 2 x 4

  6. #6
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    OK but.....

    I like General Mattis. He's on my tick list, but I'm not sure about this. "Turn the radios off" is a tad simplistic, and so-called "mission command" is not enabled just by switching off radios. - also there are very many differing types of "mission command."

    Sure, use the radios less. Practice pro-longed radio silence, but that did not mean switching them off - and as the entire command system of the US Army is essentially digital, I'm more than curious to know how this gets put into practice.
    Wilf, you may not like this and I could be wrong but I think he means to use the Prime Tenets of Maneuver Warfare. The Mission....The Main Effort....Surfaces and Gaps. Per the OODA loop. Turn the radio off.... Observe(visually see) Surfaces and Gaps. Orient on the Main effort. Decide how you can support the Mission (commanders Intent) then Act on your decision. Adjust as necessary based upon what you see ....not the chatter over the radio. Just my interpretation anyway.

  7. #7
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Wilf, you may not like this and I could be wrong but I think he means to use the Prime Tenets of Maneuver Warfare. The Mission....The Main Effort....Surfaces and Gaps. Per the OODA loop. Turn the radio off.... Observe(visually see) Surfaces and Gaps. Orient on the Main effort. Decide how you can support the Mission (commanders Intent) then Act on your decision. Adjust as necessary based upon what you see ....not the chatter over the radio. Just my interpretation anyway.
    Slap, have you considered going to a Warden recovery clinic?

    I think you're at least partway right, although I'd slim it down to seeing what the commanders at all levels can do when they don't have someone looking over their collective shoulders. At the very least it would be a start toward weeding out the sitters from the doers, and might even allow something like (gasp) actual learning, training, and safe (as in non-combat) tactical mistakes to be made and learned from.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  8. #8
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Blair View Post
    Slap, have you considered going to a Warden recovery clinic?
    They wouldn't take me....said it was a pre-existing condition

  9. #9
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Wilf, you may not like this and I could be wrong but I think he means to use the Prime Tenets of Maneuver Warfare.
    Well you're right about not liking it!!

    So called "Mission Command" is not a tennet of so called MW. Foch writes very clearly about the "ability to understand your commander" in 1911. Moltke even earlier, but I am less familiar with his work.
    I strongly believe in:

    a.) "doing your utmost to fulfil your commanders intent."
    b.) especially when the situation changes significantly from the one he issues the orders to cover.

    ..... but you cannot do a Formation crossing of the Suez Canal, using "mission command" and with no radios. It is very context specific.

    Surfaces and Gaps? OK, as long as you know that the gaps are the entrances to ambushes, - especially if you've run into North Korean, Chinese, Japanese, or Soviet Fortified region, or prepared defensive position. ... but I digress.
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

  10. #10
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Guderian crossed the Meuse at Sedan using the normal German leadership methods.
    He had trained the troops very well for that particular action before the campaign, though.

  11. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Midwest
    Posts
    180

    Default Gen Mattis to CENTCOM

    It was announced today that Gen Mattis will be taking over CENTCOM.

    Fox makes much of his previous gaffe about shooting people being fun:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ntral-command/

    Seems like a logical choice. Interesting part will be how he interfaces with Gen Petraeus. Realistically Gen Petraeus will be working directly for the president, but it will be a unique situation for both generals.

    Does this mean EBO might be spared by JFCOM?

  12. #12
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff View Post
    It was announced today that Gen Mattis will be taking over CENTCOM.

    Fox makes much of his previous gaffe about shooting people being fun:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ntral-command/

    Seems like a logical choice. Interesting part will be how he interfaces with Gen Petraeus. Realistically Gen Petraeus will be working directly for the president, but it will be a unique situation for both generals.

    Does this mean EBO might be spared by JFCOM?

    EBO, at least as JFCOM defined it in the late '90's and early 2K’s is dead as a doorknob.

  13. #13
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SWJED View Post
    EBO, at least as JFCOM defined it in the late '90's and early 2K’s is dead as a doorknob.
    Will Mattis push Maneuver Warfare as a replacement?

  14. #14
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Midwest
    Posts
    180

    Default EBO Replacement?

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    Will Mattis push Maneuver Warfare as a replacement?
    According to the SAMS instructor that talked to my class today, design is being written into the new joint doctrine.

    I know the AF is still trying to keep its version of EBO... which is different than what JFCOM used.

  15. #15
    Council Member Hacksaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lansing, KS
    Posts
    361

    Default A couple of thoughts....

    A Petraeus/Mattis lash-up will work just fine... they are of a similar mind on the most important things, and Mattis will leave AFG to Petraeus except where it impacts the rest of the AOR and at that point the will work cooperatively... not sure there was a better selection possible

    EBO is DEAD DEAD DEAD...
    Hacksaw
    Say hello to my 2 x 4

  16. #16
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    11,074

    Default Did Gen. Mattis pull duty on Christmas so a Marine could be with his family?

    Did Gen. Mattis pull duty on Christmas so a Marine could be with his family?

    Entry Excerpt:

    Did Gen. Mattis pull duty on Christmas so a Marine could be with his family? Jeff Schogol has the answer at Stars and Stripes.



    --------
    Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
    This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

  17. #17
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    11,074

    Default General James Mattis (USMC Ret) On Middle East Policy

    General James Mattis (USMC Ret) On Middle East Policy

    Entry Excerpt:



    --------
    Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
    This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

  18. #18
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    11,074

    Default Mattis on Iraq: ‘You Just Don’t Take Anything Off the Table Up Front’

    Mattis on Iraq: ‘You Just Don’t Take Anything Off the Table Up Front’

    Entry Excerpt:



    --------
    Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
    This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

  19. #19
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    11,074

    Default General Mattis: A New American Grand Strategy

    General Mattis: A New American Grand Strategy

    Entry Excerpt:



    --------
    Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
    This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

  20. #20
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Interview With General James Mattis

    Spotted today a HistoryNet interview, via Twitter and added here:http://www.historynet.com/interview-...mes-mattis.htm
    davidbfpo

Similar Threads

  1. Pakistani Army commentary
    By wm in forum South Asia
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 06-10-2018, 09:26 AM
  2. General Petraeus: collection
    By SWJED in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 280
    Last Post: 10-05-2016, 04:15 PM
  3. Brigadier General Selections for 2008
    By Cavguy in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-22-2008, 05:15 PM
  4. Afghan General Wants Special Forces To Fight Terrorists
    By SWJED in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2006, 10:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •