It will fall into chaos as a result of renewed famine and poverty, resulting in military crackdowns.
There will be a military coup that displaces the current leadership, hopefully soon.
It will continue to remain a closed society, technologically dormant and otherwise insignificant.
The leadership will eventually make a misstep, forcing military action from the United States.
RFP to others, not Dayuhan
Does it make sense to debate with someone who first asserts something strongly, then in face of historical evidence to the contrary plays the same down and finally proceeds to preventively declare all non-consenting evidence irrelevant for his other assertion?
It's kinda like debating with a priest about science.*
__________________
*: I'm curious if comparing a SWC member with a priest is (also) an offence in the eyes of the mods.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks