Quick plausibility check:

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html

"2012 : U.S. trade in goods with China"
"TOTAL 2012 (...) 127,032.0" (imports, million USD)
in 4 months, so roughly 380 billion in a year.

U.S. production of goods (this goes beyond consumption just as the trade statistic):
https://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTableHTML.cfm?reqID=5
"Gross Output by Industry Billions of dollars"
"All industries" "2010"(last available, dunno why) "25811.4"
(Note: U.S. definition of "industries" isn't actually about resource production and manufacturing only!)

Quick check using the gross figures instead of value added:
380/25811.4*100% = approx. 1.5%
So this is probably approx. where they got the pie chart's 1.2+0.7% from.

It looks to be at about the same order of magnitude as the 1.2+0.7% of the pie chart.
This was about gross output. Total GDP of the U.S. is only about 15.1 trillion, though -and only about 20% of it is primary+secondary sector. Obviously, gross output is a poor base for such calculations as it's bigger than the GDP!


Now let's look at value added:
https://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTableHTML.cfm?reqID=5 (direct links don't seem to work well there)

"Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting"
"Mining
"Utilities"
"Construction"
"Manufacturing"
(these are as far as I can tell the true goods-producing sectors)
"Value Added by Industry Billions of dollars"
year: "2011"
"177.8"
"287.6"
"250.8"
"520.3"
"1837.0"
sum: 3037


Now let's have fun and compare the 380 billion with the 3037 billion:
380/3037*100% = approx. 12.5%

I call the pie chart B.S.

(I love it when I make a 15 minute plausibility check and it's not in vain!)

Whoever compiled that chart was either incompetent, did at least one mistake less than me and/or meant to produce wrong propaganda.

After all, the share of Chinese goods in consumables is likely larger than smaller in comparison to its share in regard to investment goods.