Results 1 to 20 of 978

Thread: The Roles and Weapons with the Squad

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    CenTex
    Posts
    222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    How much damage will the bullet actually do when it gets there?
    According to most people that I've talked to, it will do enough. A friend of mine has killed people at 900M with an SPR.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Aside from the basic fact of combat life that ALL soldiers, by definition (and location) may well have to shoot the enemy with an IW and they had better be adequately trained (and practiced...) to be able to that with a weapon that is reliable and effective in worst case scenarios, I suggest that if the percentile cited were to be in fact correct, then the Army to which it applied would have some really significant organizational and purpose problems...
    Once you add up all the CS and CSS guys, then add the guys that use crew served weapons, indirect fire systems and the like, and then the leadership, you have a minimal number of people actually shooting a rifle at the enemy.

    My MTOE weapons is an M16A2, but I feel that I would be best served by an M9 and a CSW.

  2. #2
    Council Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Mountain, West Virginia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Rifles do things carbines can't, but carbines can't do some of the things rifles do. The other issue with the M16/M4 family of weapons is the caliber. For those reasons, if it comes down to an either-or choice for an Infantry rifle I'd opt for a long barrel in something more potent than 5.56mm.

  3. #3
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Red face We move in different circles.

    Quote Originally Posted by SethB View Post
    According to most people that I've talked to, it will do enough.
    Most of mine, mostly grunts and workaday SF with a random other operator type (all Army) here and there disagree, as do I. S'okay, we can do that.
    A friend of mine has killed people at 900M with an SPR.
    Possible. Also exceptional -- and the word 'reliably' comes to mind...
    Once you add up all the CS and CSS guys, then add the guys that use crew served weapons, indirect fire systems and the like, and then the leadership, you have a minimal number of people actually shooting a rifle at the enemy.
    True. One can figure 3 x 27 =111/160 Rifle Co for 69%. Arbitrarily take about ~ 80% of that for Mech inf or ~ 55%. Average about 60% per Bn..

    Figure roughly 100-120 Bns (Varies and depends); using 100 Bns that's ~75,000 X .6 = 45,000 / 535,000 = ~ 8.5% ± plus SF, LRS, the odd Convoy escorting MP (or other Branch person) and the like. So either figure, thine or mine is in the neighborhood. Put another way, anyway you slice it, we have too many 'others' not involved in combat by design.

    How many of those 'others' get involved in actual shooting combat not by design is another question entirely...
    My MTOE weapons is an M16A2, but I feel that I would be best served by an M9 and a CSW.
    I'm old, CSW to me is crew served weapon and I suspect that is not what you're referring to. The plethora of initials out there is amazing.

    Take the "SPR," I presume you mean a Mk 12 in 5.56 but there are several "SPRs" in various calibers out there including this one LINK and there are others -- proving that any High Speed, Low Drag piece of gear will draw cloning in name if nothing else...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •