http://public.cq.com/docs/hs/hsnews1...002933505.html
God help that guy with whats coming for him.
http://public.cq.com/docs/hs/hsnews1...002933505.html
God help that guy with whats coming for him.
Last edited by Ken White; 09-11-2008 at 01:20 AM. Reason: Moved to existing thread / KW
in Military Art & Science Applied > Intelligence forum at
http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ead.php?t=5832
with quite a bit of relevant discussion (except for my off-topic back and forth with Ken White, which I should have done by PM).
A moderator will probably move your post (& this one) there.
No big sin & keep posting.
The Intelligence forum should have some topics of interest to you, in light of
http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...6211#post56211from Elevation
My name is John, I'm a 19 year old college student at UMBC in Baltimore.
....
After school I hope to be able to join up with either the DIA, CIA, or one of the individual intel branches that support the military services. Probably in an analytical position, but we'll see.
If you are looking at analysis or other "home office stuff", plan on a PhD or law degree; keep up the language and area studies; and keep clean.
Same first name here, but I go by Mike (2nd name).
into the right pew, we can address this:
After reading all prior posts, please tell me:from Elevation
God help that guy with whats coming for him.
1. What's coming for him ?
2. But, far more important, your reasoned analysis of why.
First class assignment Intel Law 101
Thats a tough question
My professor in my history of Intel class had to have his lecture notes vetted before he could teach the course and I know all current members have to do the same thing whenever they want to write a book or speak in public about the Agency, due to agreements they sign. I imagine that applies to former Agency members as well, but I'm not completely sure. However, I would imagine they definitely have to go through vetting if they want to talk or publish any information regarding classified information or procedures.
I know that the case against Frank Snepp is a landmark case in terms of establishing legal precedent for the government to go after those who publish secrets without agency permission. However, it will probably be worse for Ishmael because he was even told beforehand by the Agency that he couldn't publish about 98% of the things inside the book
At the very least all profits Ishmael makes from the book will be seized and he'll potentially be facing jail time as well.
Am I on the right track at least?
What I'm also not sure about Mike, are the penalties the same for writing about classified things in a book as they are for stealing a classified document and distributing it?
Perhaps
Hint: Break down subject into two categories:
1. PRB (some refs in links on page 1) and agency's civil remedies per Snepp case. Google - lots of open source stuff.
2. Fed Criminal Statutes re: classified data - case of alleged Israeli spies in DC is recent. You will find that area something of a quagmire - where outright espionage is not involved. Same Google idea.
Answer is in links - along with known exceptions. Sources and methods can be deadly to some of our own people or their agents, even if the data is 30-40 years old. X > Y > Z.I imagine that applies to former Agency members as well, but I'm not completely sure.
Not necessarily; agency GC may elect not to go civil - DoJ may decide not to prosecute. What's the criteria ?At the very least all profits Ishmael makes from the book will be seized and he'll potentially be facing jail time as well.
You tell me.What I'm also not sure about Mike, are the penalties the same for writing about classified things in a book as they are for stealing a classified document and distributing it?
see class assignment (post # 20, page 1) - in case you missed it. A little bit of cross-posting, etc.
Bookmarks