Results 1 to 20 of 516

Thread: In The USA: the Next Revolution

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Surferbeetle View Post
    You can do better, walk us through your points and display your mastery or understanding of the subject and positions you are advocating for.
    Simple.

    1. TARP presented little to no risk to federal taxpayers (assuming it makes sense to talk about risk where it concerns taxes), either before or after the fact. The authorized expenditure for the entire program is less than the tax receipts returned by the top 1 percent, of which only $388 billion was dispersed. TARP certainly presented no risk at all to any person who didn't pay federal taxes, as they are not contributors to any account drawn on by the federal government. Finally, what sense does it make to talk about "risks" to taxpayers? A tax doesn't have a return. A bond, however, does, and the federal government can run deficits.

    2. There is no evidence whatsoever that credit agencies improperly rated any MBS derived from subprime origination. Bill and Jarod confuse MBS rating with CDO rating.
    Last edited by Presley Cannady; 11-05-2011 at 08:37 PM.
    PH Cannady
    Correlate Systems

Similar Threads

  1. Evolution Vs. Revolution
    By Rob Thornton in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 08:38 PM
  2. Revolutionary Patterns
    By TROUFION in forum Historians
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-25-2007, 04:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •