I feel compelled to respond since I was named in your post.
Quote Originally Posted by Presley Cannady View Post
2. There is no evidence whatsoever that credit agencies improperly rated any MBS derived from subprime origination. Bill and Jarod confuse MBS rating with CDO rating.
The senate investigations clearly states that both were improperly rated. Here's a link to a press release summary. And the actual 600+pg report.
1) Inaccurate Rating Models. From 2004 to 2007, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s used credit rating models with data that was inadequate to predict how high risk residential mortgages, such as subprime, interest only, and option adjustable rate mortgages, would perform.

2) Competitive Pressures. Competitive pressures, including the drive for market share and need to accommodate investment bankers bringing in business, affected the credit ratings issued by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.

3) Failure to Re-evaluate. By 2006, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s knew their ratings of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) were inaccurate, revised their rating models to produce more accurate ratings, but then failed to use the revised model to re-evaluate existing RMBS and CDO securities, delaying thousands of rating downgrades and allowing those securities to carry inflated ratings that could mislead investors.

4) Failure to Factor In Fraud, Laxity, or Housing Bubble. From 2004 to 2007, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s knew of increased credit risks due to mortgage fraud, lax underwriting standards, and unsustainable housing price appreciation, but failed adequately to incorporate those factors into their credit rating models.

5) Inadequate Resources. Despite record profits from 2004 to 2007, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s failed to assign sufficient resources to adequately rate new products and test the accuracy of existing ratings.
Inaccurate AAA credit ratings introduced risk into the U.S. financial system and constituted a key cause of the financial crisis.