Results 1 to 20 of 304

Thread: Suppressive Fire

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Compost View Post
    A typical level was 100 rounds: 60 in magazines, 40 in clips.

    That correlates with another reference. [/ QUOTE]The normal 60 rounds per rifleman, carried in three magazines, had been calculated taking into account the 3RAR usage rate.[/ QUOTE](McNeill, Ian; To Long Tan, Allen & Unwin 1993, p321)
    Wow. 100 rounds seems pretty low to me (although those are just my uneducated "feelings"). I wonder how the troops felt about the amount of ammunition they carried.

    Perhaps my perceptions are skewed due to the videos I see on youtube and such featuring engagements in Iraq/Afghan. A number of them contain troops firing streams of 5 - 10 rounds at a time, in which case I do not believe 100 rounds would be adequate at all.
    Last edited by Blah; 12-22-2010 at 09:36 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Moving the Rhod. Fire Force concept to Afghanistan?
    By JMA in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 196
    Last Post: 08-15-2011, 10:05 PM
  2. Fire with Fire
    By IVIaedhros in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 12:16 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-30-2007, 05:39 PM
  4. Friendly fire death was preventable: government report
    By marct in forum The Coalition Speaks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 05:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •