JMA,

I have read the paper and agree with you.

There are numerous critical points, for two examples the author refers to the poor quality of SB intelligence, when it was the SB who were the key personnel in the Selous Scouts intelligence unit. Secondly, the emphasis on the killing of enemy wounded - which I am sure did happen at times - is in contrast to the ability of the Selous Scouts to "turn" captured guerillas.