Actually that was for the first 20 units of the MOP, which is heavier and more sophisticated, and includes ongoing R&D costs as well.Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09
The MOAB is intended to replace the BLU-82 Daisycutter...
Actually that was for the first 20 units of the MOP, which is heavier and more sophisticated, and includes ongoing R&D costs as well.Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09
The MOAB is intended to replace the BLU-82 Daisycutter...
BUT as long as it takes a single C130 to deliver it and that C130 is not a noted breaker of a solid ADA2 environment ...what is it good for outside of "show and bluster" and "Wag the Dog"......
Even those that it is suppose to "impress" know it's main weaknesses.....last time I checked IS did not have a sophisticated ADA2 environment over AFG....
At least the Daisycutter was used to open up Landing Zones for troops...but again also never used in a heavy ADA2 environment....
In fact the largest Russian thermobaric weapon is far more effective...against cave environments than is the MOAB....
Bookmarks