Results 1 to 20 of 281

Thread: General Petraeus: collection

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    Council Member Rob Thornton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fort Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    Things I think you might see:

    - a comprehensive approach that considers the linkages between the various wars and tensions within the CENTCOM AOR, and effort spent to coordinate with the adjacent GCCs and the Inter-Agency where boundaries matter.

    - a great deal of energy spent on persuading Iraq's and Afghanistan's neighbors that they have clear and enduring interests in assisting those two states to succeed, and that the United States succeeds as well - and as such they should be more involved and proactive in ensuring they do.

    - a staff that is more focused on a CDR's articulated guidance to support the Iraq and Afghanistan commands.

    -guidance passed to those two commands that is not constraining, but empowers and creates unity of effort from a regional perspective

    -more energy directed back toward informing and leveraging the whole of government, and on keeping civilian leadership focused on future risks - again with a regional perspective

    -regional actions that match a regional and broader U.S. narrative

    - a command that lets the commands in Iraq and Afghanistan focus on their campaigns and not on fighting higher

    Things I think you will not see
    :

    - micro-management of either Iraq or Afghanistan

    - the sacrifice of U.S. regional interests to ensure a legacy associated with Iraq

    - a command that does not play well with others - be they GCCs, or the Inter-Agency

    - a command that does not consider the strains placed on the force providers and institutions, and as such absolves itself from all risk to the services, or to FP goals outside the CENTCOM AOR.

    - a staff that does not enable subordinate commands

    It has been my observation that the commanders who excel at any level are those who identify what are the things that only they can do by virtue of position and in some cases by personality – and focus their efforts as such. The broader the responsibilities, the more things that compete for your attention – as such, the art is knowing what is important, and why. They are also ones who consider the broader picture, and can empathize with those below, adjacent and above them. I think at that level you really need some strategic vision as the moves we make today will be with us for some time to come.
    Best, Rob
    Last edited by Rob Thornton; 04-24-2008 at 12:18 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Pakistani Army commentary
    By wm in forum South Asia
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 06-10-2018, 09:26 AM
  2. Relationship between the political system and causes of war (questions)
    By AmericanPride in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 03-30-2008, 09:16 PM
  3. A Chat with David Petraeus
    By SWJED in forum US Policy, Interest, and Endgame
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 02:18 PM
  4. Afghan General Wants Special Forces To Fight Terrorists
    By SWJED in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2006, 10:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •