Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 96

Thread: Another Loopy Anthropologist

  1. #61
    Council Member Van's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    414

    Default

    I did what I could: I bought a BMW motorcycle today
    Great way to derail the thread, Steve.

    Now, all you academics who rate a little respect out of us neandrethals, get back to abusing your collegues who are in desperate need of a clue.

    Jeesh. Just when it was getting good.

    Oh yeah, "testosterone-laden" as a perjorative? I can't even address this without a reciprocal ad homonim attack.
    Last edited by Van; 06-03-2008 at 11:17 PM. Reason: Pulled back from being too personal.

  2. #62
    Council Member zenpundit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    262

    Default Caveat

    Selil wrote;

    "Dr. Mckenna in his own way is helping prove my thesis that academia has moved to far into specialization and there are issues with the silos of disciplines in the University"
    While I endorse Sam's argument, I think the problem with academics like McKenna is that they like to borrow the prestige accrued from their disciplinary "silo" and apply it unearned to their political opinions, which may or may not be any better informed than those that can be heard in any local bar, circa 3 am.

    They skip over the hard thinking part in order to get to the intended result they "know" is right. A bad methodology. If you are "right" then your reasoning will withstand fair scrutiny. Or even a lot of unfair scrutiny.

  3. #63
    Council Member Ron Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,099

    Question I agree thats part of it

    Quote Originally Posted by zenpundit View Post
    Selil wrote;



    While I endorse Sam's argument, I think the problem with academics like McKenna is that they like to borrow the prestige accrued from their disciplinary "silo" and apply it unearned to their political opinions, which may or may not be any better informed than those that can be heard in any local bar, circa 3 am.

    They skip over the hard thinking part in order to get to the intended result they "know" is right. A bad methodology. If you are "right" then your reasoning will withstand fair scrutiny. Or even a lot of unfair scrutiny.
    I also agree with Sam on the culture that has developed over the years regarding academia and it's (for lack of a better term) presentation to those outside of it's esteemed halls.

    I was asking someone the other day about tthis sort of thing and truthfully I find it curious how the concept of self preservation may dwell at the base if the issues much as with any other group in society.

    How often is it that the relevance of one's particular studies or acollades actually coincides with a been there done that in order to truly validate their knowledge base.

    Example : (among the hallowed halls how many of those whose expertise or specialty truly comes with as much experience as it does education) There must be balance but if one where to look at war for instance, there are relatively few opportunities to be both a battle hardened and PHD educated individual when you look at it in the grander scheme of things.

    I say all this to say, does it really seem all so unlikely that there might be somewhat of a discomfort between those who are the educated SME of what military's do and those who actually have done it and are also coming into their academic silos?
    Any man can destroy that which is around him, The rare man is he who can find beauty even in the darkest hours

    Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur

  4. #64
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    beltway
    Posts
    8

    Wink Headline: Multi-Skilled Leader alway open for coaching

    Quote Originally Posted by Cavguy View Post
    Interesting apology. How topic was brought up did not reflect well on:

    A) Status as Military Officer
    B) PhD Canidacy
    C) General Discourse.

    You're welcome here in the battle of ideas. Not to insult the council members. Attack the idea, not the messenger. We do have pretty divergent viewpoints here, as evidenced in many threads. I had not commented on this one simply because Dr. McKenna wasn't worth the energy.
    Thank you for continued coaching, CavGuy. You are a gentlemen and scholar.
    Unfortunately, my preacher told me a long time ago that I can not take away the "spoken word, spent arrow, or missed opportunity." This thread has turned course and actually brought up some great issues. (I even got Rob Thorton to participate!)

    Therefore, thank you for welcoming me aboard in your CavGuy way...let me know what else I need to do to get my spurs...

    Sincerely,
    MSL--my 3rd or 4th post! I lose count it's getting so high!

  5. #65
    Council Member zenpundit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    262

    Default An important point by Ron

    Ron wrote:

    "I say all this to say, does it really seem all so unlikely that there might be somewhat of a discomfort between those who are the educated SME of what military's do and those who actually have done it and are also coming into their academic silos?"
    Agreed. When individuals who are highly competent in one field, have success in a second, it discomforts everyone in the second field who were resting on their laurels. And it's a good thing that they are shaken up. When you stop growing intellectually and exploring, it's easy to stagnate, ruminating on the same comfortable assumptions and familiar concepts. You end up becoming a defeneder of the orthodoxy or status quo.

  6. #66
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Hi Sam,

    Quote Originally Posted by selil View Post
    The latest piece is about the construction of academic learning models and curriculum. The blog article is "Education paradigm: How you get there may not be where you are going", and is fairly lengthy.
    It's a very interesting piece. I was going to post a reply here, but I needed a blog topic, so I put it up here instead .
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  7. #67
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    I want to register a complaint--you guys have taken my emotional and adolescent rant and hijacked it into something important and even profound. I guess I'm going to have to work even harder to make sure the threads I start stay in the gutter.

  8. #68
    Council Member Tom Odom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DeRidder LA
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    Nice bike, Steve....

    keep it out of the gutter...

    Gutter threads are safer...

  9. #69
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Hey, hey. Neat Bike!

    Enjoy and play with the ABS, it's awesome.

  10. #70
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Hey Steve,

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    I want to register a complaint--you guys have taken my emotional and adolescent rant and hijacked it into something important and even profound.
    Isn't that what academia is all about !?!
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  11. #71
    i pwnd ur ooda loop selil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Belly of the beast
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    Young Dr. Metz finally gets a real bike... Mine though is red http://selil.com/slideshow/bmwr1200c/ .

    The other BMW I had until recently was this one http://selil.com/slideshow/bmwk1200ltc/ .

    The lengthy posts have to go on my BLOG, I um.. well ... err.. run out of space on the forum and then Stan calls me names.
    Sam Liles
    Selil Blog
    Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
    The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
    All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.

  12. #72
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by selil View Post
    The lengthy posts have to go on my BLOG, I um.. well ... err.. run out of space on the forum and then Stan calls me names.
    I know, it's just terrible !! Stan keeps calling ME a romantic (okay, it's true but still !).
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

  13. #73
    Council Member sandbag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Sorry, guys, but I just can't see what all the fuss is about. I'd take McKenna's offer more seriously if it brought actual anthropology into the discussion. Politics and anthropology are interrelated, but they are still different topics.

    To state your thesis and then gird your argument with a mixture of fictional narrative, opinion pages and a veneer of statistics does not discourse make.

    I'd like to ask the following: does Dr. McKenna's body of work really even apply to our profession? Based on what is posted thus far, I'd argue that it does not. Let's say for argument's sake I'm mediocre at best (maybe this is more true than I let on!)as a tactical-level officer. I have x experience in y operational type. Does this make me qualified to then speak of microeconomics of Culture z? I don't think McKenna has to have served or anything, but I'd like to think that more relevant work than his would be needed. Does somewhere like the AWC grant him audience based on his desire for discourse rather than what he brings to the discourse? Hell, as a disgruntled Major, I'd love to teach at the AWC, but I hardly consider myself qualified to do so.

  14. #74
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Right on target, MAJ

    This is written by a non-academic Google searcher, with no credentials in anthropology or sociology - other than going out with a soc. grad student at the U of Mich (she was a nice girl).


    1. The term "military anthropology", in current use, refers to the use of socio-cultural anthropologists in support of military operations. Some views as to that:

    [American] Anthropology Association Formally Disapproves of Military Program
    http://chronicle.com/news/article/33...litary-program

    Kinship Studies - Military Anthropology
    http://kinshipstudies.org/?page_id=109


    2. USAian "Military Anthropology", as a socio-cultural study of the US military as a "tribe" (with a very extended family, indeed), seems absent as a sub-branch of socio-cultural anthropology.


    3. Military sociology is an established sub-branch of sociology. E.g.,

    Journal of Political and Military Sociology
    http://www.jpms.niu.edu/

    Guy Siebold, Core issues and theory in military sociology (2001)
    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...07/ai_n8977420


    4. Basic tenets of socio-cultural anthropology require field work; i.e., living near or with the tribe, eventual interaction with its members, their consent to tell their human story, etc. We might also note that the military "tribe" has its own language.

    WSU Cultural Anthropology Program: "All graduate programs in cultural anthropology emphasize the importance of field work. All students are encouraged to conduct original field research as part of their graduate training. A foreign language is required at both the M.A. and Ph.D. levels. ... The [MA] thesis should be based on original fieldwork. ... Students whose fieldwork will be conducted among non-speakers of English will be expected to demonstrate competence in this language in a way that satisfies their committees before fieldwork begins."
    http://libarts.wsu.edu/anthro/gradcult.html


    5. Don't know if the US military would like to studied as a "tribe"; but it would seem to be an interesting subject for an open-minded anthropologist, even if not of the "tribe" or its extended family. Of course, he might find it a cannibal tribe (OP: "... our students would eat him alive and pick their teeth with his bones."). Sounds like Philip Caputo's novel "A Rumor of War" where his marines get super hungry on a search & destroy.
    Last edited by jmm99; 06-07-2008 at 01:48 AM. Reason: factual error

  15. #75
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    But we have to recognize that there is ideological content in using tribes as a universal model for human society. It was a rejection of the idea that there are "advanced" and "less advanced" societies, or "civilized" and, at least, "less civilized." Of course, this idea has been common in Western culture since the ancient Greeks (and in other cultures like the Chinese).

    Beginning in the 1960s (if not earlier) there was an intellectual movement, leftist in ideology, which rejected this idea, stressing that all cultures were more alike than different.

    This debate has intensified again as people have sought to place the "war on terror" (and I personally hate that phrase an refuse to use it without quotation marks) in context. Once school of thought attributes it to shortcomings or flaws in Islamic culture. The other--popular within the ideology that dominates many academic disciplines--rejects this explanation and seeks others, most often the idea that violent extremism from the Islamic world is a defensive response. Downplaying the structural and functional differences between Islamic and Western cultures is an element of this explanation.

    There, that's the only thing even vaguely thoughtful I plan to say today. I take delivery on my midlife crisis motorcycle (which I have labeled "Mein Schwein") in a couple of hours, so plan to spend the day attempting to not become a brain smear on the pavement.

  16. #76
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    so plan to spend the day attempting to not become a brain smear on the pavement.
    Never, ever go into a corner too fast. (It's extremely difficult to slow down mid corner and I've read a couple of articles in the local paper about part time riders - enjoying the nice weather - who have gotten themselves killed just by going into a corner too fast.)

    I'm all for amateurs jumping into the deep end - and mid life crises - but risk management is crucial. (I'm going to racing school, because there's about 200 yards of empty field around the track in case I screw up.) Stay safe and have fun.

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    But we have to recognize that there is ideological content in using tribes as a universal model for human society. It was a rejection of the idea that there are "advanced" and "less advanced" societies, or "civilized" and, at least, "less civilized." Of course, this idea has been common in Western culture since the ancient Greeks (and in other cultures like the Chinese).

    Beginning in the 1960s (if not earlier) there was an intellectual movement, leftist in ideology, which rejected this idea, stressing that all cultures were more alike than different.

    This debate has intensified again as people have sought to place the "war on terror" (and I personally hate that phrase an refuse to use it without quotation marks) in context. Once school of thought attributes it to shortcomings or flaws in Islamic culture. The other--popular within the ideology that dominates many academic disciplines--rejects this explanation and seeks others, most often the idea that violent extremism from the Islamic world is a defensive response. Downplaying the structural and functional differences between Islamic and Western cultures is an element of this explanation.
    When I got time to start a new thread, I was going to say - based on observation and not ideology - we seem to be having a lot more success working directly with tribes instead of nation building. It looks as though the "ungoverned territories are a breeding ground for terrorism" school of thought is in need of some revision.
    Last edited by Rank amateur; 06-07-2008 at 11:33 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    Sometimes it takes someone without deep experience to think creatively.

  17. #77
    Council Member SteveMetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rank amateur View Post
    Never, ever go into a corner too fast. (It's extremely difficult to slow down mid corner and I've read a couple of articles in the local paper about part time riders - enjoying the nice weather - who have gotten themselves killed just by going into a corner too fast.)

    I'm all for amateurs jumping into the deep end - and mid life crises - but risk management is crucial. (I'm going to racing school, because there's about 200 yards of empty field around the track in case I screw up.) Stay safe and have fun.



    When I got time to start a new thread, I was going to say - based on observation and not ideology - we seem to be having a lot more success working directly with tribes instead of nation building. It looks as though the "ungoverned territories are a breeding ground for terrorism" school of thought is in need of some revision.

    I've never subscribed to the "ungoverned territories are a breeding ground for terrorism" idea. To tell you the truth, I think that's more a justification for a large military than it is a description of reality. Even if it were true, more effective and efficient to launch spoiling attacks as needed than to try and turn ungoverned spaces into governed ones. There are good reasons that ungoverned spaces are ungoverned, and it isn't because it never occurred to the local regime to emulate Americans (which is what we tend to assume).

    I think I'm going to be OK cornering, given my tens of thousands of miles on road bicycles. Only ever went down on it once, and that was when I was really new at it and a kid ran in front of me.

  18. #78
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Yes!

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    ... Even if it were true, more effective and efficient to launch spoiling attacks as needed than to try and turn ungoverned spaces into governed ones. There are good reasons that ungoverned spaces are ungoverned, and it isn't because it never occurred to the local regime to emulate Americans (which is what we tend to assume).

    I think I'm going to be OK cornering, given my tens of thousands of miles on road bicycles. Only ever went down on it once, and that was when I was really new at it and a kid ran in front of me.
    To both!

    Have fun!

  19. #79
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    I think I'm going to be OK cornering, given my tens of thousands of miles on road bicycles. Only ever went down on it once, and that was when I was really new at it and a kid ran in front of me.
    But none of those were when you were having a mid life crisis, and the guys I read about didn't lay it down, they went too fast, "pushed" wide and hit something. Pick your spots. Have fun.
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    Sometimes it takes someone without deep experience to think creatively.

  20. #80
    Council Member marct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    But we have to recognize that there is ideological content in using tribes as a universal model for human society. It was a rejection of the idea that there are "advanced" and "less advanced" societies, or "civilized" and, at least, "less civilized." Of course, this idea has been common in Western culture since the ancient Greeks (and in other cultures like the Chinese).
    Yup, and if anyone is feeling masochistic, I have a pretty decent lecture on that development. It's actually tied in with general conceptualizations of cosmic time and, specifically, with views on whether time is linear, circular or spiral. In the West, the formal expressions of it go back to Herodotus and the development of a form of social engineering (e.g. history as a mechanistic explanation).

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    Beginning in the 1960s (if not earlier) there was an intellectual movement, leftist in ideology, which rejected this idea, stressing that all cultures were more alike than different.
    Certainly earlier inside Anthropology (~1895+) - things like the psychic unity of mankind and other Boasian concepts tended to reject the earlier ideas of unilinear evolution and social Darwinism. World War I was pretty much the death blow to the old unilinear evolutionary models except in various leftist enclaves, which tended to have an early form of multi-linear evolution anyway.

    Actually, the stress wasn't so much on the cultures being the same as it was on a) humans, as a species, being the same and b) socio-economic forces operating as "natural laws". Pretty much the only school of social theory that adopted both these points were the varieties of Marxism. At the same time, say the 1950's - 60's, they also had enough symbolic capital to act as a visible opponent to functionalism and they got taken up by many as the ideology of choice against the status quo.

    From a scientific standpoint, I hold that they are extremely flawed in both their basic assumptions and in their adoption / co-optation of religous symbolism. First, most of the Maxian theories are based on two totally false premises: the labour theory of value and a general dismissal of individualistic motivations like greed, anger and stupidity. Second, part of the reason why they were adopted stems back to the old Cold War conflict with the Soviets and a sub-conscious symbolic binary opposition, something aong the lines of "functionalism supports capitalism and he US goivernment, only the Soviets (Marxists) oppose it, therefore if I oppose the actions of the US government I must be a Marxist." Or, to put it more formally,

    Marxists oppose Capitalism
    I oppose Capitalism,
    Therefore I am a Marxist

    Rule of the excluded third <sigh>; typical of magical thinking.

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveMetz View Post
    This debate has intensified again as people have sought to place the "war on terror" (and I personally hate that phrase an refuse to use it without quotation marks) in context. Once school of thought attributes it to shortcomings or flaws in Islamic culture. The other--popular within the ideology that dominates many academic disciplines--rejects this explanation and seeks others, most often the idea that violent extremism from the Islamic world is a defensive response. Downplaying the structural and functional differences between Islamic and Western cultures is an element of this explanation.
    Steve, I totally agree with you on the ridiculousness of the term "War on Terror". It is a classic example of magical thinking and, in many cases, is analytically useless. I also agree with you on the binary split that has shown up; the Clash of Civilizations vs. the Victimization of Islam. Sometimes I am amazed (and PO'd) at how readily we dust off pseudo-scientific explanations from the dustbin of history. Huntington's Clash model is really only a slightly updated form of deGobineau's model from 1853 see here), while the Victimization advocates are implicitly, and sometimes explicitly, arguing that radical Islamist irhabi violence is merely an expression of emergent class consciousness.

    Where, I keep asking myself, is the science in all of this? It certainly doesn't show up in most of the academic stuff I've read except in the works that are extremely situated ("tactical" one might say). Personally, I'm still waiting to find (or build ) a theoretical model that is more predictive than the two currently available.
    Sic Bisquitus Disintegrat...
    Marc W.D. Tyrrell, Ph.D.
    Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
    Senior Research Fellow,
    The Canadian Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, NPSIA
    Carleton University
    http://marctyrrell.com/

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •